Talk:Detroit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Detroit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 4 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Detroit is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 2, 2006.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 23, 2006 Peer review Reviewed May 30, 2006 Featured article candidate Promoted March 1, 2013 Featured article review Demoted Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 24, 2010, July 24, 2011, July 24, 2014, July 24, 2017, and July 24, 2018. Current status: Former featured article

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Michigan: Detroit Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Detroit task force. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities United States High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[Gabriel Richard#Work in Detroit|Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus]] The anchor (#Work in Detroit) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

I have NEVER heard anyone who lives around Detroit pronounce the name of the city as DEE-troit other than people making fun of people from the rest of the country who don't understand that the name comes from the French words "de troit" (of the river), were the "de" is specifically de-emphasized. NO native person from Detroit ever uses that pronounciation, in the same way that all lifelong Michigan residents will only pronounce Mackinac ("MACK-in-aw") as "Mack-in-ak" only as a way of making fun of the same level of ignorance as those who prounounce Illinois as rhyming with "noise", or pronouncing either or both occurences of the letter "s" in Des Moines, Iowa. Look up my IP address in http://iplocation.net/ 96.70.70.49 (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

I came here to say the same thing as a native of the city. I'm especially confused by the "locally also" part of the pronunciation - it is specifically NON-locals who (mis)pronounce the city that way, other than sometimes in the form of the "DETROIT BASKETBALL" and "DETROIT BASEBALL" chants at Pistons and Tigers games (which is more about having both words have the same rhythmic patterns). I know the source says that, but perhaps we could get a dispute on that alongside it - certainly a Detroit native has written something complaining about the DEE-troyt mispronunciation. Beggarsbanquet (talk) 05:47, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm wondering if anyone had thoughts on whittling the history section on this page down substantially. I ask this because the History section has become quite large and perhaps unwieldy. Should we:

I'd love thoughts from folks. Happy editing!

(This is my first RFC. I hope I did this right. I had to edit it because I didn't initially even see that we had a separate History of Detroit page!) Bill Heller (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

• (A) Keep size as was on 19:22, 28 December 2025 here -- (I'm deliberately avoiding taking a position supporting or opposing the changes by the RfC poster just prior to this RfC.) The individual sections within the history section look about the right length to me. It's good to see a substantial history of the city, which is lacking for far too many locations on Wikipedia. If the entire length of the article is getting close to the maximum allowed, I would reconsider. How close is it? --David Tornheim (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

  It's very far below the maximum size. Max size is usually about 2 million bytes. This article is 240,879. After I added some recent history and cleaned up some out of date stuff ("will be developed into" to "was developed into"), I figured I'd ask what the community thought about the length. Bill Heller (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

• (B) Edit to include a reduced size History Section in WP:Detroit with a link to the other page..

I do think there is an unnecessary level of detail. The legacy section also seems oddly positioned. It might be worth referring the length of other US city / state history sections and somewhat following along their organization.

There's a lot of historical explanations to stuff that isn't directly related to Detroit, for example:

When Great Britain evicted France from its colonial possessions in New France (Canada) in the peace terms of the Treaty of Paris of 1763, it also removed one barrier to American colonists migrating west across the mountains. British negotiations with the Iroquois would both prove critical and lead to the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which limited settlements South of and below the Great Lakes and west of the Alleghenies / Appalachians. Many colonists and pioneers in the Thirteen Colonies along the East Coast, resented and then simply defied this restraint, later becoming supporters of the rebellious American Revolution.

As well as a passage that mentions they switched to LED lights, and the history of the Michigan Central Station seems extraneous.

All this being said, I don't live in Detroit, so take my words with a few grains of salt. :) MSWS (talk) 08:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

• Somewhere between (A) and (B).

By which I mean: The history section could be trimmed to be something like 2/3 to 3/4 of the current length, but I would not support a more substantial removal. ("Reduced size" in option B covers a whole lot of ground.)

There is some unnecessary detail (as User:MSWS has pointed out), and like a lot of articles there tends to be a recency bias. However, I like having the in-depth historical perspective in the article, particularly for a city like Detroit where the historical changes are a big part of defining what the city is today. Andrew Jameson (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

B. This is, to my knowledge, standard procedure for when it becomes unweildly. uᴉɐʇsǝɥʇuƎ uoʇsᴉoʅɓoʅɥԀ (Hit Me Up) 19:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

This section is way way way too long and should be cut back to two paragraphs, maybe three. There is already a separate article on the history of Detroit, we don't need much of anything here. GA-RT-22 (talk) 14:05, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

It seems like there's an effort to remove mention of Woodward and the Woodward Plan from both this article and the History of Detroit article. Woodward is a major figure in the history of our city, state, and oldest university. The Woodward Plan is the basis for the reconstruction of the city after 1805. I'm wondering why all of this isn't recognized as it seems pretty fundamental to Detroit. Ztmcfaul (talk) 17:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply