Talk:Definitely Maybe/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Basilisk4u (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


You've been waiting way too long for a review. Let's do this! Basilisk4u (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Suitability of the nomination

Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions include "Anyone may nominate an article to be reviewed for GA, although it is preferable that nominators have contributed significantly to the article and are familiar with its subject and its cited sources. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination." It does not appear that WikiEditCrunch has contributed anything to the article.[1] Also, there is no indication that they consulted any actual contributors to the article. This has come up in other "drive-by" GANs by the editor (Talk:The Doors/GA1, Talk:Vietnam War/GA1, etc.), which were quick failed. This article also has sections of unreferenced material, so it is difficult to tell what may be original research and therefore doesn't meet the verifiable criteria of the GA standards. —Ojorojo (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I can try to fix this (I wanted a GAN eventually...). I'd have otherwise removed the nomination. Depending on how far off this is from GA, I'd let you fail it if necessary. Though I certainly hope that's not the case. dannymusiceditor oops 22:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
I have decided to fail it given the lack of response from the nominator. Basilisk4u (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.