Talk:Databricks

Any objections to a NPOV rewrite? 43.224.122.102 (talk) 04:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Databricks

This article reads like sales material.

Any objections to a NPOV rewrite? 43.224.122.102 (talk) 04:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Definitely needs one. Especially this very AI-sounding sentence (undue emphasis, em dash usage, and rule of three)
> and functions as a managed AI infrastructure provider by providing proprietary foundation models—including those from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini—directly within its secure perimeter. ~2026-40098-10 (talk) 02:54, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Product Section Updates

Could this recent update be added under Products? I have a COI COI with the page topic but have never posted on Wiki before. Is this the best place to post a change or do I need to request this change somewhere elsewhere?

In June 2026, Databricks released Omnigent, which it called an open source meta-harness for AI agents, like Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex, which are classified as harnesses, or the wrapper that turns AI models into agents.(1) Omnigent is a common interface layer above command-line agents that allows users to build, control and collaborate on AI agents across models.(1)

During the company’s June 2026 “Data + AI Summit” conference, Databricks announced a real-time analytics engine called Lakehouse//RT, LTAP (lake transactional-analytics process), an architecture to collapse OLTP and OLAP on a single copy of data, and Genie One, an agentic “co-worker.” (2)(3) The company also released Genie ZeroOps, which automates monitoring, investigation and remediation of issues across data and AI workloads. (4)(5)

Citations: (1) https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318419/20260615/ai-agent-orchestration-gets-control-plane-databricks-open-sources-omnigent.htm (2) https://venturebeat.com/data/databricks-says-it-solved-the-decades-old-data-pipeline-problem-thats-been-slowing-ai-agents (3) https://www.forbes.com/sites/victordey/2026/06/16/databricks-ceo-says-hes-cracked-a-40-year-old-database-problem-with-ltap/ (4) https://www.wsj.com/cio-journal/databricks-releases-general-ai-agents-for-businesses-abffb409 (5) https://siliconangle.com/2026/06/16/databricks-new-agentic-coworker-genie-one-brings-ai-automation-every-part-business/ LizDIH (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@LizDIH: Can you attempt to generate citations for these URLs in Wikimedia markup? Also, can you go through your proposed text and make wikilinks to other Wikipedia articles for the concepts which need explanation, and have Wikipedia articles?
This is the place to make editing requests. The more you conform your submission to Wikipedia's standards, the easier it is for reviewers to evaluate. Thanks for proposing. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:12, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Eh, this is usable enough. I can go though. I don't think "meta harness" is a recognized term, so that'll need to be in quotes (and other edits may require some changes too). --FeldBum (talk) 18:07, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Made some edits, but added everything. I'll close the request. --FeldBum (talk) 20:05, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Bluerasberry and @FeldBum, appreciate your recommendations and will use the future requests (plan to share a few more soon). @FeldBum, I mentioned adding this under Products since it's specific to that and how the page is currently organized - could you add it there? LizDIH (talk) 18:52, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, my bad - that makes sense. I'll update. --FeldBum (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I started the article for Agent harness some time ago and I just linked to it from here. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

August Requests

Sharing requests for review below, I have a COI. My colleague posted the previous request but is currently OOO so I'm posting this one. @FeldBum: @Bluerasberry: wanted to check if this format better meets your Wikimedia Markup feedback on the previous post? Want to make sure we’re providing properly. Thanks editors! Alice Inkhouse (talk) 19:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add to summary box:

  • Industry: Artificial Intelligence

Intro Paragraph:

  •  Done
  • Revisions to improve accuracy, bolded: Databricks, Inc. is an American data and artificial intelligence software company headquartered in San Francisco, California.[1] The company was founded in 2013 by the original creators of Apache Spark at the University of California, Berkeley.
  •  Done with edits
  • Delete this line as it's redundant with the changes to the first sentence: It offers a cloud-based platform for data analytics and artificial intelligence.

Add to Acquisitions:

  • In June 2026, Databricks announced plans to acquire Panther, an AI SOC platform. Panther’s technology will support Databricks’ development for the security lakehouse capabilities of Lakewatch. [2]
  • Partly done as I don't yet see a source for the second line. Checking the press release to see if I can use that.

Add to Funding:

  • In July 2026, Coatue Management led a funding round for a $3 billion investment in Databricks, which would make the company’s overall valuation $188 billion. [3]
  •  Done with edits

Add to Collaborations:

  • In July 2026, Databricks and Microsoft announced an expanded integration of each other's products, including advanced native integration through Databricks Genie and Microsoft 365. [4] [5]

General Question: I'd like to share page reorg suggestions and plan to post as a separate request. Is there a process or structure I need to follow when suggesting? Here are some examples so you get an idea:

  • The History section includes information that’s already in the Funding section
  • Collaborations lives under Revenue, but I think it would make more sense as a sub-header under History?

References

  1. ^ "Databricks expands Microsoft Azure partnership, to use more custom chips". Reuters.
  2. ^ "Databricks strikes deal to buy Panther Labs in cybersecurity push". Reuters.
  3. ^ Clark, Kate; Jin, Berber (17 July 2026). "Exclusive | Databricks Set to Hit $188 Billion Valuation with New Investment from Coatue". Wall Street Journal.
  4. ^ "Databricks expands Microsoft Azure partnership, to use more custom chips". Reuters.
  5. ^ "Databricks and Microsoft expand Azure partnership into the 2030s".

Alice Inkhouse (talk) 19:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Alice Inkhouse: Thanks for posting. If you want to propose alternative drafts, you can build and demo those in your WP:Sandbox, then link to those from here.
Can you give a go at changing your citations here to be more than bare URLs? See WP:CITE / Help:Citation tools for guidance. You should be able to find a tool to populate these and it is a basic wiki skill that will help you make requests.
If you do not format your citations, then someone else has to do it, and that delays a response.
While you are here, can you provide open copyright licenses to any infographics or media or screenshots which explain or illustrate databricks? A few images are often very helpful in explaining topics like this one. Thanks. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Bluerasberry: Thanks for getting back to me so quickly and for additional suggestions. I have a few questions. When my sandbox reorg is ready for review, would I just post a new request on this page or add it as another comment to this topic? For the media uploads, are those something I add to wiki media and link here as well when ready or is there another process?
Could you let me know if this is better for citations?

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Alice Inkhouse (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Alice Inkhouse: Are you able to see a lot of red error messages here? If you need help tell me what kind of device you are using and I can send you to the right tutorial. The end result should be nicely formatted citations. The easiest way to get there is using the citation generation interface in whatever tool you are using. Drafting this in your sandbox is likely to be the easier way, as depending on different factors, you may be seeing a different editing interface on this talk page versus the editorial space like your sandbox. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Removed linebreaks, were causing tracked syntax errors (HTML5-incompatible misnesting). Also added missing "www.", due to "check citation url warnings". Zinnober9 (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Zinnober9@BluerasberryThank you for your help and sorry my links appeared broken because of the line breaks I used to visually organize. I'll pull the source code from the changes you made to format them in the future. Let me know if you have any other questions as you review the request.Alice Inkhouse (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Late to the party here but I can help too. The first set of edits look pretty straightforward. Let me look at other pages for changing the pronoun "It" to "The company."
As for reorging the page, I think that makes sense. Lots of repitition here. I'll reply with an idea of a new org, or I'll just start moving text around. --FeldBum (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.