Talk:Data product

Can someone explain the "Too few opinions" tags on this article? I see about 10 contributors to the article, many sources. What else would be needed? ~2026-3467

Talk:Data product

Help re: Too few opinions

Can someone explain the "Too few opinions" tags on this article? I see about 10 contributors to the article, many sources. What else would be needed? ~2026-34677-0 (talk) 13:21, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would conccur. I am a modest contributor to Wikipedia, still learning the rules. What else should we be doing to remove this tag? The various translations available have the same source and do not have this flag. jgp (talk) 18:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Let's start with the simple fact: the term "data product" was in use for more than half a century. It was part of the standard lingo of US government agencies for the most of the second half of the 20th century. Thus the history starting with DJ Patil in 2012 and some "Data Mesh" is highly misleading. The definition also appears incorrect, as the "data product" meant simply an output of the software program or data collection device. The term is fairly generic, thus the article must reflect the actual meaning(s), as opposed to the narrow view of "Data Mesh". Викидим (talk) 02:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can you add your sources to the article and we move on? ~2026-42068-35 (talk) 06:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I just pointed to a flaw, and did not propose a solution. Essentially, the current scope (and definition) are not correct, better sources and text are needed, and this is a significant effort that I have no time to undertake. Getting sources to verify my words is easy: just search the Google books for "data product" while limiting the search to pre-1985 publications. This would yield multiple mentions of "data products" for sale some 25+ years before "Data Mesh". But this is an (easy to obtain) proof that the current text is incorrect, not the good sources fit for rewriting. Викидим (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.