Talk:Data management plan
The article is slanted in a very DMP positive direction, making unsupported claims about the efficacy of DMPs. I would welcome a discussion about how to improve
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Problematic claims
The article is slanted in a very DMP positive direction, making unsupported claims about the efficacy of DMPs. I would welcome a discussion about how to improve the article so it reflects current research on the subject while still acknowledging the various DMP requirements and mandates from funders and universities. More references to published research would be great! (I have modified some of the most brazen claims about DMP benefits.) --Glitterspont (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Request for edits
I work for the Digital Curation Centre and in particular I'm a developer on the DMPonline tool for creating DMPs. I think it would be useful to add a section on DMP tools (DMPonline and the already-referenced DMPTool), though it would be a conflict of interest for me to add that myself. --Paddy (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Source for idealized DMP
- Miksa, Tomasz; Simms, Stephanie; Mietchen, Daniel; Jones, Sarah (February 13, 2018). "Ten simple rules for machine-actionable data management plans (preprint)". doi:10.5281/zenodo.1172673.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
Generalisation and internationalisation
Though a common issue across WP, it's best if US items are used as examples, rather than the entirety of the article. Could be useful to draw more heavily from the international Research Data Alliance. Topics covered include:
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.