Talk:Data-driven journalism

suggestion to merge articles: data journalism into data-driven journalism; I'm not sure that there is a meaningful distinction. Perhaps earlier on, but not at

Talk:Data-driven journalism

Merger Discussion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge data journalism into data-driven journalism, on the grounds that any distinction between the concepts has been lost over time, so they are best discussed together. Klbrain (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

suggestion to merge articles: data journalism into data-driven journalism; I'm not sure that there is a meaningful distinction. Perhaps earlier on, but not at this time in the open-data era. Nigelhenry (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose: one describes the art of presenting data (Data journalism), while the other describes a way in which journalist might initiate conclusion; being driven by the data (Data-driven journalism) rather than by something more subjective. I really can't see how 'open data' softens the distinction. Klbrain (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support. I don't think the articles actually make such distinction, and they sometimes even seem to contradict it. My online search shows no wide acceptence of a distinction. DataJournalism.com sometimes refers to them as practically the same (see under "data journalism is the future"). In 2019 the website started ditching DDJ as a term and unified its brands. Paul Bradshaw's "The Inverted Pyramid of Data Journalism", referenced in the DDJ article, makes no mention of "driven". Based on a quick keyword search in The Art and Science of Data-Driven Journalism, it seems to use the two terms interchangeably, as do all other sources I've found when googling "data journalism" "data-driven journalism" (e.g. [1], [2], [3]). @Klbrain: what did you base that distinction on? Veritas94 (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
It appears that user:Klbrain doesn't object. Also, I think merging data-driven journalism into data journalism is more fitting as the latter term is more common. Veritas94 (talk) 13:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the pings. I had based my views on reading the articles, in which Data journalism describes, in the Areas covered section, that Data-driven journalism is a subset (perhaps notable) of the broader subject. Also, the natural language meaning of the two phrases is different. Nevertheless, I accept that the references show mixed use of the terms, and if there is any distinction it may be so fine as to not warrant separate coverage. So, I wouldn't object to a merge. Klbrain (talk) 19:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Updated the data-driven journalism article

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

August 17th, 2011: Added more structure to the article, especially regarding the steps from raw data to a story. Additionally, a number of links to examples, tutorials and other material where added. Mirkolorenz (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Visual of the data-driven journalism process

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As of March 1st, 2011 a visual aiming to describe the process of data-driven journalism has been added to this entry. It is very simple, yet tries to make a point that data-driven journalism should be viewed as a process, where raw data is used in order to understand issues that are relevant for the public. Mirkolorenz (talk) 10:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Guardian example: MP expenses

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The MP expenses at the Guardian might be another example; for that it might be interesting to relate data-driven journalism further to where the data is coming from (e.g. government data, crowdsourced data, combination...). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Where data-driven journalism is going on

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The NY Times definitely has people doing data-driven journalism (e.g. Alan McLean).

In August the European Journalism Centre had an event on data-driven journalism; might be a good place to look for other people to quote/mention. Their homepage mentions these groups: The New York Times (US), The Financial Times (UK), The Times (UK), The University of Amsterdam (Netherlands), The Open University (UK), The Open Knowledge Foundation (UK), Medienkombinat (Germany) Hacks/Hackers (US), OWNI (France) IBM (France), Ultra Knowledge (UK), KB Consulting (Germany). The roundtable is chaired by Mirko Lorenz, DDJ Project leader, EJC and Innovation projects, Deutsche Welle. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://wiki.opendata-network.org/Data_Driven_Journalism points to some writing about data-driven journalism; might be a good source for external links, e.g.

  • A fundamental way newspaper sites need to change | Adrian Holovaty | Sept, 2006 holovaty.com
  • Journalism Needs Data in 21st Century | Zach Beauvais | Aug. 2009 ReadWriteWeb

Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Examplefarm and linkfarm

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've started some cleanup of the numerous examples (including external links) per WP:EL, WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTHOWTO, and WP:EXAMPLEFARM. --Ronz (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

COI edit request: definition/process one-liner (AIJIM)

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Proposal for the definition/process section (not in the lead, to avoid undue weight):

“Recent literature has proposed an evidence-first integration model for AI in journalism (AIJIM), outlining a six-stage workflow and an auditable evidence chain.”[1]

COI disclosed (author of the cited chapter). Placement outside the lead to avoid undue weight. NamicGreen (talk) 16:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. This change seems to be promotional. Remember that articles should be written from a WP:NEUTRAL point of view. NotJamestack (talk) 00:54, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ Tiltack, Torsten (2026) [16 October 2025]. "AIJIM: A Scalable Model for Real-Time AI in Environmental Journalism". In Arai, Kohei (ed.). Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2025, Volume 2. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 1676. Springer, Cham. pp. 398–416. doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07989-3_26.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.