Talk:DailyTech

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Media Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments

It seems dailytech is dead, it hasn't been updated in almost half a year... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.126.206.226 (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

1. Please delete reference 4 Kubicki, Kristopher. "To Name or Not to Name?". It does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyhallmailbox (talk • contribs) 11:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

• Can someone add the information about Dailytech and Microsoft's 360? I saw recent discussion about them and the Xbox 360 RROD and my local news attributes Daily Tech for publishing the real 360 defect rate... right before MS announced the 1 billion dollar fix for it.

• Dailytech leaked the Penryn benchmarks. Can someone please add this to the main page? 75.215.11.1 09:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DailyTech. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070618163850/http://kristopher.us:80/2007/06/to-name-or-not-to-name.html to http://kristopher.us/2007/06/to-name-or-not-to-name.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080210064004/http://blogs.usatoday.com:80/techspace/2007/06/reviewing_techj.html?csp=34 to http://blogs.usatoday.com/techspace/2007/06/reviewing_techj.html?csp=34

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply