This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).
Articles
Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
I'm scared
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm a little surprised to see a notability challenge on this article, threatening to remove it or merge the info with the album's article. This article is not a stub, and contains enough information to justify it's existence, I believe. Merging this info into the More album article would introduce clutter.
Currently, every Pink Floyd song has an article. I can imagine someone might think this is unnecessary, and wants to pick just one to delete for now, as an example. A better choice could have been made. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Cymbaline (altered lyrics from the movie "More")
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'd like to know what are the actual "Cymbaline" lyrics that differ from original motion picture soundtrack?
I've listened to that part many many times, but could not decipher it. Contaminator (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Contaminator (talk • contribs) 08:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Don't know the answer, but this isn't the place to discuss it. Article talk pages are for discussing improvements that could be made to the article, not for discussions about the subject, and lyrics cannot be quoted at Wikipedia for copyright reasons. You might have better luck asking at a Pink Floyd fansite. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 12:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Genre
Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Blogs are definitely not reliable sources; fansites are also not regarded as acceptable (necessarily). Regarding this particular article, your change seems to be taking the previous genre and breaking it down into 3 parts. This is not necessary. We should only list more than one genre if the song actually falls into several distinct categories. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 00:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
In case of this song, I think we must change the genre to Folk Rock or Progressive Rock or even Progressive folk. The problem with this song is it falls in very diferent genres. The song uses nylon string guitar, bass, piano, drumset, bongos, and Farfisa organ, some of this instruments characterize the Folk rock genre. But the song also has a progressive development so its falls in progressive music too. In other hand, some parts are psychedelic. In my opinion the best genre choince is Progressive folk. I waiting the opinion of the others. Sorry for my bad English, it ins't my primary language.--Italodal (talk) 22:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm opposed to "progressive folk" because this is not a recognized genre, even if someone did create a Wikipedia article for it. We should stick to common genres. While I agree there is a strong folk element to other songs on this album, I think this one is in a more general pop music style. The instrumentation does not take away from its being a rock song, and it's simple enough that it doesn't need to be labelled "progressive". I feel the current genre is correct. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.