Talk:Crunode

The function locus-graphed in the picture has a saddle point at the origin, so I believe its Hessian matrix must be indefinite. There exist crunodes that are l

Talk:Crunode

Saddle points and Hessians

The function locus-graphed in the picture has a saddle point at the origin, so I believe its Hessian matrix must be indefinite. There exist crunodes that are local extrema of the locus function (consider ), so I'm not sure that there is anything to say about the Hessian here. --Tardis 16:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes you are right about the indefinite hessian. Whether (x-y)^2(x+y)^2 should be considered a crunode is an interesting question. If you take a classification of singularities, you find that x^2-y^2 and (x-y)^2(x+y)^2 have different types, the most important type being the simpler case. I'm not at all clear wherther the more complex case should really be called a curnode or not.
Taking the simplest case I think the defining characteristic is that the determinant of the hessian is negative, that is the quadratic form is hyperbolic. Acnodes have elliptics quadratic forms and cusps have parabolic forms. --Salix alba (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Crunode?

I've never heard the term crunode in my life. Is there a relation to node? The picture depicts what most people would call a node, not a crunode. The stuff about the Hessian contradicts the picture. This article is in serious trouble.--345Kai (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes the info about the Hessian was wrong, somehow it didn't get corrected last time it was pointed out. I think the term is a little dated, but it is well sourced in certain parts of the literature.--Salix (talk): 17:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image quality

There is a vector image available Media:Cubic_with_double_point.svg. Is it not enough?Electron Kid (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.