Talk:Creately

This article was nominated for deletion on September 14, 2016. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was nominated for deletion review on 27 December 2020. The result of the discussion was Overturned.

The user:82.132.213.249 is violating WP:PA and continuing to disruptive editing in this page. I see this article was deleted via a deletion discussion in 2016 where there was two delete votes, out of which one was by a sockpuppet. Respecting the outcome of the AFD, I should say apparently the topic has gained more prominence. We can go for another AFD I think to see if this is suitable. But keeping the concerns about the article aside I must say, the user:82.132.213.249 is violating WP:PA and disruptive editing. --61.216.157.181 (talk) 07:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

This article is little more than a WP:REFBOMB'd advert for a non-notable product. There's no indication of notability here per WP:GNG or WP:CORP. The sources cited are mostly puff pieces from the likes of TechCrunch, and there's also no indication of notability for the awards claimed to have been won. The claims of notable users, for what that's worth, are also poorly sourced. 82.132.213.249 (talk) 07:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it is fact based and verifiable from easily available sources. I have edited the article to remove any promotional part --Hareshamjadu (talk) 07:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is my first article. The software is mentioned in various news references, books, academic journals etc. Due to my inexperience I mistakenly added some content which made the article promotional. I have changed the troubling parts. Now the article should be good. If it is still suffering from issues, kindly help me to fix this. Please see similar software pages Gliffy it has similar set of references as Creately, Piktochart it has promotional references and press releases, MagicDraw it has blogs in the references. I picked Creately, seeing its a well known, one of the oldest diagram maker and very widely used software having 4 mn users as this must have its place in an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. But if it is not deserving, kindly illustrate why the similar and even lesser known softwares are there? --Hareshamjadu (talk) 10:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hareshamjadu, you might like to take a look at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WaggersTALK 10:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply