Talk:Constance Bennett

We do have an article on Constance Bennett. I suppose the statement to the contrary should be deleted. Not sure what it should say so leave that to others. Jus

Talk:Constance Bennett

Deletion

We do have an article on Constance Bennett. I suppose the statement to the contrary should be deleted. Not sure what it should say so leave that to others. Just watched a technicolor musical starring Constance with Warner Baxter, Alan Mowbray, Mischa Auer, and others. What a gorgeous, classy creature she was! She made the clothes she wore look great! She would have made a potato sack look great! Pity she died young.

Deleted link to Richard Bennett as it's the wrong Richard Bennett.

Comments

These notes are hard to follow if no one signs the comments. Meetbawl (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Military contributions?

it is stated that she was buried in arlington as a consequence of her 'military contributions'. but no mention is made anywhere of what these may have been. did she do uso shows? was she actually in the military? can't tell from this article. people who write here need to learn how to do a cohesive, cogent article. this kind of loose end looks really, really bad.Toyokuni3 (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

1938 Libel Suit

In the Jan/6/1938 Toledo News-Bee, pg 18 ("Radio is Too Nice") there's a mention of a $250,000 libel suit by Constance Bennett, apparently against newspaper/radio gossip columnist Jimmy Fidler. http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=k_8v9Q84L5sC&dat=19380106&printsec=frontpage&hl=en pg 18

This is mentioned on wikipedia's page for Fidler, but not here on Bennet's page. There is no mention on Fidler's page of the suit's outcome. The description on the Fidler page makes it seem like a trifle, one actress snubbing another on a movie set, hardly grounds for libel.

Though I can find plenty of examples of Fidler's newspaper column, "Hollywood Shots" from around that time period, (e.g. in the Reading Eagle Dec/1/1937), I've been unable to discover any more information about this libel suit. http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=ZuSUVyMx-TgC&dat=19371201&printsec=frontpage&hl=en pg 15

DiffuseGoose (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ahhh, just found more detail about the original suit, in the St. Petersburg Evening Independent Jan/4/1938, pg 7. http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19380104&id=aeNPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=M1UDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2046,1030560 and Fidler won the suit, St. Petersburg Evening Independent Oct/17/1938, pg 11, by which time the amount had grown to $600,000. http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=888&dat=19381017&id=2mgxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=UU0DAAAAIBAJ&pg=5725,5493564 DiffuseGoose (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constance Bennett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.