Talk:Component diagram

I take issue with the assertion that "files" and "headers" are physical objects. The person who wrote this is a programmer who is used to thinking of the diffe

Talk:Component diagram

I take issue with the assertion that "files" and "headers" are physical objects. The person who wrote this is a programmer who is used to thinking of the different diagrams through an analogy to physical space. It is more likely that the author intended to say "functional" or "sovereign".

I removed the term physical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.78.112.2 (talk) 12:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

This entry does not really say anything and what little it says is erroneous (physical components?? The physical manifestation of Components are Artifacts). This requires a complete rewrite and I propose to do that in the coming days.

Kishorekumar 62 (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

When is the right version coming? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.17.120.141 (talk) 20:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I disagree that the example diagram is indeed a component diagram. There is a confusion between instances and component definitions in the example diagram. They should be separated more clearly. This is not actually a component diagram, but a composite structure diagram afaics. The whole point of component diagrams is reasoning on what a component requires functionally from other subsystems, then separately satisfy that need by instantiating a component that provides it. This is the base for allowing substituability of a component by another realization of the same interfaces.

In other words, either you represent component definition (required & offered interfaces), or you represent component instantiation (composite structure), but both should not be mixed.

YannTM 132.227.64.140 (talk) 08:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.