Talk:Comparison of OpenDocument software

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

The entry for Google Docs in the table should be edited to note that Google Docs only support OpenDocument Text and Spreadsheets but not Presentations. I am not familiar with the syntax for editing a table so I will leave this information here for someone else to edit it in.Stephen Judge (talk) 17:32, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

A sub-article on OpenDocuments/Supporting Applications may do the job.--- I'd go and move this article over there, deleting this entry. Louie 19:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm moving this page to Comparison of OpenDocument software per the rest of Category:Software comparisons.

-- Gudeldar 14:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a plugin for ODF. Does that qualify MS Office to be on that list?

MS Office ODF plugin

It doesn't use ODF. It is possible to install a plugin that exports to ODT and hopefully soon other ODF formats. (please always sign comments) --DuLithgow 13:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

See OpenDocument. --88.24.125.157 17:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Comparison of OpenDocument software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026030022/http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/ to http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821102835/http://docvert.org/ to http://docvert.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130070736/http://tools.odftoolkit.org/odfvalidator/ to http://tools.odftoolkit.org/odfvalidator/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026030022/http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/ to http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20061212175251/http://odf.cita.uiuc.edu/ to http://odf.cita.uiuc.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Libreoffice supports odf 1.0 to 1.3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6D40:3491:A701:51F2:1EAA:35AC:AAF2 (talk) 15:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply