Talk:Color gradient

Talk:Color gradient


Radial Gradient?

Shouldn't Circle Gradient be Radial Gradient? I have never personally seen a program that uses circular instead of radial. FrigidNinja (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Yes, it should. And now it is. Thanks! CWC 05:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why Only Computer Graphics?

I'm not sure why this topic is limited to computer graphics. Peter Max used color gradients extensively in his artwork from the 60's and 70's. How did he do it? Not by computer I would wager. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.201.93.194 (talk) 03:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is a good question, it would be nice if someone who understands the underlying technical and/or mathematical concepts added their knowledge to this article. I want a bear as a pet (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC).Reply

Other shapes?

Does the content of the "Other shapes" section make sense to anyone? If it does, could that person rephrase it so that it is more understandable than it is now? Because "taking two colors on the radius and not forgetting the aspect of a fourth one towards the interior of the radius" sounds like complete gibberish to me. Thanks. -- 91.56.248.228 (talk) 18:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seems to have been edited to "In some specialized occasions it is appropriate to grab a color gradient that takes two of three colors at the radius of a polygon or other shape and that doesn't forget the aspect of a different color, preferably the fourth, towards the interior of the radius or such a gradient may be removed by combining multiple color gradients, with the straight skeleton of the polygon used to determine the boundaries between pairs of axial gradients.[6]", which is still incomprehensible. I can't even make syntactic sense of it, where it says "or such a gradient". 99.230.45.8 (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.