Talk:Clone (computing)

-does cloning's end result mimic reverse engineering? 2603:6010:E000:EEB2:5183:C573:B504:9355 (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Clone (computing)

cloning

-does cloning's end result mimic reverse engineering? 2603:6010:E000:EEB2:5183:C573:B504:9355 (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Exact?

WRT "a clone is hardware or software that is designed to function in exactly the same way as another system". Often, clone is used to mean that sw provides the functionality of an original yet can provide more functionality than the original. Logically, if it provides more, then it does not function in exactly the same way as another system. For example, Vim (text editor) is considered a clone of vi (text editor), and Vim provides much more functionality than vi. Vim is called an improved clone so one could say: clone means exact while a qualified variation like improved clone is not exact (is a superset). Even so, that nuance should be described here. Another example: Linux is considered a clone of Unix, but surely they do not provide the same functionality. In fact, a Linux variant may not even be a proper superset of a Unix variants (and certainly not all). So, clone does not even always imply that the derived provides all the functionality of the original. It seems to mean that the derived provides a certain level of similarity and compatibility with the original. A certain set of functionality is exactly the same. Stevebroshar (talk) 10:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.