Talk:Claros

Isn't "Claros" the same place as "Clarus" which has its own article? Shouldn't the material in both articles be combined? 66.28.241.34 (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2

Talk:Claros

Combine this article with Clarus?

Isn't "Claros" the same place as "Clarus" which has its own article? Shouldn't the material in both articles be combined? 66.28.241.34 (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes these are duplicate pages and should be merged. Clarus is the Latin spelling of Klaros, or Claros which is the (original) Greek. Κλάρος — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.102.217.163 (talk) 10:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the two articles both concern the same place, "Clarus" is more about the general history of the site, "Claros" (for which I have just tried to re-write the text to make it read like English) is more about the archaeology. 22 September 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.16.204.219 (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

After a whole day of hard labor the merger is done now.--AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Factual errors corrected, suggestions for further improvement

After reading the article for Clarus and consulting the sources for merging that article with this article, I noticed there were some notable factual mistakes:

  • The Epigoni did not flee after sacking Thebes, but the Thebans were captured and sent to Delphi by the the Epigoni after they conquered Thebes.
  • Calchas was not a Trojan, was not a refugee and did not succeed Mopsus.
  • According to this article (i.e. Claros) Alexander the Great consulted the oracle at Claros. But according to Pausanias it was the Smyrnaeans who did so, Alexander only decided to refound Smyrna and the Smyrnaeans asked the oracle if they should move to the new Smyrna.

I've corrected all of this now. But there still remain some more improvements to be done. Right now, the section on the excavations contains much information about the history of the site itself. That content should be moved to the appropriate subsections of the History section instead. The Excavations section should concern itself with describing the excavations if you ask me. And of course, as I've indicated with Template:Citation needed, we need a lot more sources to back up all the claims. Given the factual errors I've already discovered here, I take all the claims lacking a reference with a big grain of salt. --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.