Talk:Christianity

Talk:Christianity
Former featured articleChristianity is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 18, 2004.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
December 26, 2005Featured article reviewDemoted
July 14, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
November 15, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of October 1, 2006.
Current status: Former featured article


The references used do not support the claims being made

No I assumed the 2018 study was referring to believers in Christ from a Muslim background which has been labelled as unreliable as you can see here WP:JOSHUAPROJECT. However when I looked at the three references given for the 12 to 15 million figure none of them mention it nor do they support the page numbers given in the reference tag. I suggest you look into this instead of labelling my edits as “disruptive”. @Durziil89 Griggorous (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I am confused by a section that begins with the word "No". What's really going on here? HiLo48 (talk) 23:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion was initially made in the edit summaries but durziil89 has not responded besides in the edit summaries. Griggorous (talk) 00:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think it's a misspelling of the word "now". Lucian Azoitei (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I suggest you go through the three references given the 12 to 15 million claim is not mentioned in any of them:
1.Ibrahim, Ayman S.; Greenham, Ant (2018). Muslim Conversions to Christ: A Critique of Insider Movements in Islamic Contexts. Switzerland: Peter Lang Publisher. pp. 336–341.
The pages from 336 to 341 make no such claim
2.Radford, David (2019). Religious Identity and Social Change: Explaining Christian Conversion in a Muslim World. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 104–105. ISBN 9780367869755.
From page 104 and 105 doesn't make the claim of 12 to 15 million in fact it talks about Kyrgyz christian converts and interviews with them
3.Muslim-Christian Relations: Historical and Contemporary Realities. Oxford University Press. pp. 2–10.
Does not discuss conversions of any sought if you look at the pages between 2 and 10.
@Durziil89 Griggorous (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
These three sources where all added in a single edit by @Koshuri Sultan. They are all behind various pay walls (so I haven't checked them myself). If someone has access to these sources and could check that would solve this dipute. Rolluik (talk) 13:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
You can use websites like z-libary to access the sources. Griggorous (talk) 19:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2026

Please change the percentage of 28.8% to 29.4% for anyone looking for more literal equations. ~2026-11265-98 (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. meamemg (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Rejection of Ephesus

if you are going to mention the effect of the rejection of Chakcedon then you should also mention the effect of the rejection of Ephesus ~2026-12147-71 (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy

The Church of the East and Anabaptists should be removed from the taxonomy of major denominational families in Christianity. The selection of churches and denominations included is entirely arbitrary. I suggest that only those churches and denominations that have served as state religions at some point in history be included: Anglican, Reformed, Lutheran, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox. JOAOHKM (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Christianity is not a monotheistic religion.

Christianity does not have traits of what it would require to be a "monotheistic religion." This is due to the trinity and worship of Jesus as a man. There should be another label, maybe polytheistic or trinitarian. But, calling it monotheistic is an insult to actual monotheistic religions. ~2026-25088-48 (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

We go by what reliable sources say. Masterhatch (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Trinity and many other sources will help you understand why you are wrong. And, as stated above, we go off of reliable sources, not personal opinions. Jtrevor99 (talk) 22:33, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Christianity is monotheistic because it teaches the existence of one, and only one, supreme Creator God, inherited from Jewish tradition. While Christians believe in the Trinity Father, Son, and Holy Spirit this is defined as three distinct persons sharing one divine essence, rather than three separate gods. Wondersonder (talk) 07:50, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
it is monotheistic though? Im a Christian and we believe in a Triune God not three Gods ~2026-37432-48 (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Trinity is one being, so... Barumbarumba (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Goofyahh trying to insert his personal opinions on a Wikipedia article ~2026-39565-02 (talk) 20:52, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
As Francesca Stavrakopoulou stated, true monotheism does not exist. See also There’s no monotheism in the Bible on YouTube. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:30, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
ARE YOU SERIOUS RIGHT NOW!!!??? Trinity means THREE FORMS OF GOD!!
Look, I'll show you a diagram
THE FATHER ( Creator and Preserver)
THE SON (GOD in human form)
THE HOLY SPIRIT (GOD in your heart who guides you along the way)
All of these are forms of God, who is one. And ONLY' one... SinplicityOverused598 (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
This is why Christianity is true monotheism... SinplicityOverused598 (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.