Talk:Chemical process modeling
It seems the Process simulation article is mostly about chemical processes. For some reason, Process Design redirects to Process simulation, even though there
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Merging Process simulation into Chemical process modeling
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Time to close discussion as no consensus. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
It seems the Process simulation article is mostly about chemical processes. For some reason, Process Design redirects to Process simulation, even though there is a separate Process design (chemical engineering) article. Does anybody have any thoughts on this matter? H Padleckas (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- I made Process Design now redirect to Process design (an article of its own), which makes more sense to me. The aforementioned Merge proposal still holds. H Padleckas (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Looking at the two articles I agree that they should be merged. In my experience the technology is usually referred to as process simulation hence Chemical process modeling is best merged into Process simulation. If anyone felt inclined an article on Dynamic Process Simulation should be developed as it is a area of expertise in its own right. Scottinthebox (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- These are different articles. Do not merge. Rlsheehan (talk) 17:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.