I think the section for cflow should be split from the page on GNU cflow. (or, GNU cflow should be a section on a normal cflow page) 73.96.36.33 (talk) 07:13, 8
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
I think the section for cflow should be split from the page on GNU cflow. (or, GNU cflow should be a section on a normal cflow page) 73.96.36.33 (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
WRT "...was initially an implementation of the UNIX cflow utility."
I don't think it makes sense to say it's an implementation of a utility. A utility _is_ an implementation. This should probably say: 'implementation of the POSIX command' or 'based on the UNIX utility'. I think both may be true even though their implication is different. Stevebroshar (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.