Talk:Bryan Singer

Talk:Bryan Singer

@Doniago: Please stop undoing my intro edit.

There was no synthesis involved. It's pretty obvious that he hasn't been very active in Hollywood. Even if we can't say he's lacked work, we should at least say he's lacked any credits. —theMainLogan (tc) 06:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

To what end? The rest of the article (specifically the filmography) will make it clear that he lacks any credits, or at least any that any Wikipedia editor felt like adding to his article. Also, I don't see how it's not synthesis to claim that Singer hasn't had any work, unless you have a source that has made that claim. Do you have such a source? DonIago (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
https://www.timesofisrael.com/disgraced-hollywood-director-bryan-singer-said-living-in-israel-planning-comeback/
https://www.avclub.com/bryan-singer-documentary-about-himself-1850512101
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/bryan-singer-documentary-sexual-assault-claims-1235634544/
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/bryan-singer-floating-doc-that-will-address-sexual-misconduct-allegations-1235508331/
...and common sense based on information the article already provides.
Seriously, does all this talk about a "comeback" sound like they're describing a guy who's been doing well in the past few years?
theMainLogan (tc) 04:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
We can say (in our own words) what those sources say, but we can't use them to draw broader conclusions such as, "he hasn't been doing well" (unless a source says that); that's the very definition of original research. DonIago (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.