Talk:Breakout clone

I suggest breaking down the 'Breakout fundamental elements' by citing specific games, or even just reduce to a list of games that have been described as breakou

Talk:Breakout clone

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I suggest breaking down the 'Breakout fundamental elements' by citing specific games, or even just reduce to a list of games that have been described as breakout clones in reliable sources. Marasmusine 20:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. I had pruned some of the listing by the basic qualifications of notability (lack thereof) and copyright violation. Truthfully, I think the fundamentals should be stripped as you mention. A list of notable clone games is all you really need, similar to some of the other clone pages for games such as List_of_Pac-Man_clones. --Marty Goldberg 20:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also found a bunch of games listed on Arkanoid as 'Arkanoid clones' which would be more at home here. Again, references required to see exactly if journalists have called them Breakout clones or Arkanoid clones rather than delving into original research. List requires cleanup! Marasmusine 21:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Possible future references:

Confusion

Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Here's the original text of Block kuzushi (merged with this article):

Block kuzushi (ブロック崩し burokkukuzushi, literally block destruction) is the name given in Japan to the genre of computer and video games in which blocks are destroyed by a bouncing ball, and the player controls a paddle at the bottom of the screen to keep the ball in play. The first example of such a game was Breakout, although Arkanoid is arguably more popular. Since this is a fairly narrow definition of a genre, it is often not considered as such (especially outside of Japan), and games of this type are usually simply referred to as "Breakout clones".

A number of block kuzushi games were released in Japan under the title Block Kuzushi, including members of D3 Publisher's Simple series and a Color TV Game system by Nintendo. However, this is a generic name referring to the genre (similar to a tennis game being called Tennis). The games titled Block Kuzushi are all distinct games and should not be considered as a series.

I'm confused by what is meant by this statement: "...it is often not considered [a genre] (especially outside of Japan), and games of this type are usually simply referred to as "Breakout clones"."

Does this mean there's a second, different term (separate from "block kuzushi") that means "Breakout clone"? Compare these translations of the same Yahoo! Japan search result: [3], [4]. The first one translates ブロック崩し to "breakout"; the second translates it to "blockdestroying" (a variation of the "literal" translation cited in the article). SharkD (talk) 06:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

You'd likely have to ask the original author of that bit, but I suspect there's nothing more to it than poor sentence construction. My guess is that the latter ("Breakout clone") portion refers to how such games are viewed outside Japan ("especially outside Japan") rather than suggesting that within Japan "Block Kuzushi" games are somehow set apart from a class a games known there as "Breakout clones". It's poor writing on its face, so I'm not sure you should read too much into it. D. Brodale (talk) 07:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
To clear up any mistaken understandings, I was not suggesting that the block kuzushi games were classified into different categories. I meant that there exist two different terms, block kuzushi and "breakout clone", that were being applied to the same category. SharkD (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
And even then, Breakout Clones aren't really a genre in itself. They're a subclass of what's termed the "bat and ball" genre. The rewrite of the opening makes that a bit misleading. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Block kuzushi

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Here's some (preliminary) research on block kuzushi, copied from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Block kuzushi. SharkD (talk) 02:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

"If you're curious (and wish to establish notability), Here is a machine translation of the Japanese Wikipedia article on the subject. Here is a machine translation of the Amazon.com page for one of the sources cited in the article. Here is the homepage for the author of the second source (I'm not sure exactly which book is being referenced). Here and here are search results for ブロック崩し (about 857,000 hits). Note, the latter link, a poorer translation, returns the "literal" meaning cited in the article. (...)" SharkD (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Differences?

Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

What's the difference between a Breakout clone and an Arkanoid clone? I read the Arkanoid article, but wasn't able to see how they differed. SharkD (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arkanoid was the first Breakout clone to introduce dropped power-ups (multi-ball, laser, etc), so I assume all the "Arkanoid clones" have power-ups. To be honest, I think the list should be scrapped and started again with citations explicitly stating "breakout clone" or "arkanoid clone". Marasmusine (talk) 09:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The reason I ask is because there are some articles in the category [edit: Category:Breakout clones] which call the games "breakout clones". I wasn't sure where to add them to the list, as the list of Breakout clones is for "notable" games only, yet the list of Arkanoid clones doesn't seem to have these reservations. SharkD (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
In addition to what Marasmusine said (about the "Arkanoid Style" games), the history in regards to this article was that section was a separate article that was merged in. As far as notability, generally if its of historic value (i.e. was a well known clone for a historic platform - commodore, acorn, atari, etc.)) it was kept. If it was a modern homebrew or a modern pc-clone, it was not. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 21:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Block kuzushi

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Block kuzushi article has been merged here per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Block kuzushi. Neil ☎ 11:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Common game mechanics

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you look at early revisions of this article, you'll find that the common game mechanics found in the genre were listed. This content was removed, ostensibly because there weren't any sources to back it up. However, the Gamasutra article seems to cover many of these points. Maybe the deleted content can be resurrected? SharkD (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Another 1988 clone

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Popcorn was a moderately popular clone that included a level-builder. 1 64.122.15.114 (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bogus Notable Clones

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This looks suspicious to me 

Bodkins Johnson! (Boothies Revenge) (1987 Blitkrieg Software) (1987, Amiga)

Can't find any other references to it online, should it be removed? If not it's in the wrong section. --79.76.181.254 (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, yeah. You can contest and remove any information that does not cite a reliable source (although it's courtesy to at least have a look for a citation, which you did do :> ) I think some of these are homebrew / PD games. They shouldn't be here unless they are noteworthy. Marasmusine (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Little Brick Out

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This Apple clone should be included in the chart because it was included in the early system software disks for the Apple II, plus the main article already reveals a connection between the original Breakout and Jobs/Wozniak. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

More clones

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

These games probably aren't notable but it might worth to check them in the future, maybe they will become notable:

—  Ark25  (talk) 06:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

On mobile some other clones are available for example:

Reference issues

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

"is a sub-class of the "bat-and-ball" genre[3][4][5] introduced with the Magnavox Odyssey's Tennis and Atari's Pong.[6][7][8][9]"

Only two of those links are still working, the rest are dead, making it really hard to verify what's on there. However, if you want to describe the relationship between Break-out clones and Pong, may I suggest Chris Crawford's "The Art of Computer Game Design", which defines "Paddle games" as Pong-based games and cited Breakout as an example: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~stewart/cs583/ACGD_ArtComputerGameDesign_ChrisCrawford_1982.pdf

I'm really not sure what the Gamasutra reference is even doing there. It talks about Pong, but doesn't mention Breakout, nor does it define the genre that Pong started. It seems completely irrelevant, unless I am missing something?

Lastly, this article really needs to mention Arkanoid outside of the list; it's basically become a sub-class of the sub-class that is breakout clones (which, now I think about it, I always refered to as "Brickbreakers"...) Anyway, I have absolutely no idea how to handle this article. It's like it has a complicated history of edits and I don't want to make it even worse... Maplestrip (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Seeing as nobody seems to know what to do with all of those dead links, I went ahead and removed them entirely. Same with the completely irrelevant Gamasutra reference. This way, not much is left of the article, but at least now we have something to work from... ~Mable (chat) 10:59, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is a list!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Perhaps a name change should happen to List of notable Breakout clones? Hmm, and then we should also create some inclusion requirements such as sales numbers.

You know, that, or we remove that list and actually turn this into an encyclopedic article? ~Maplestrip (chat) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Breakout clone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.