Talk:BrahMos
.ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; } Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit requestThis article is related to Indian military history, whic
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BrahMos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to Indian military history, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to Indian military history, part of the contentious topic designation for South Asia.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
Chronology table
| No | Date | Test range/Platform | Version | Service | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | June 12 2001 | Chandipur-on-sea | - | ||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 6 | |||||
| 7 | 14 June 2004 | Chandipur-on-sea | [1] | ||
| 8 | |||||
| 9 | |||||
| 10 | 21 December 2004 | Pokhran | Land to land version | Indian Army | |
| 11 | 1 December 2005 | Chandipur-on-sea | Land to sea version | Indian Army | [2] |
| 12 | 1 June 2006 | Pokhran | |||
| 13 | 4 February 2007 | Chandipur-on-sea | |||
| 14 | |||||
| 15 | 5th March 2008 | ||||
| 16 | 18th December 2008 | Rajput class destroyer | Ship to Ship/Land | Indian Navy | [3] |
"Pinpoint accuracy"
The use of the phrase "pinpoint accuracy" in the the third paragraph is a clear violation of Wikipedia:FLOWERY in my opinion given that accuracy is not quantitatively described with circular error probable. The term is ostensibly attributed to this article, but has been in various outlets since at least 2015, with sources (to my knowledge) ultimately pointing to statements made by those involved in the testing or development of the missile itself (the first link does not provide any attribution, while the second links to someone from BrahMos Aerospace, for instance).
I think we should delete this phrase entirely (end at "800 km range") or modify it along the lines of "reportedly pinpoint accuracy", sourcing concerns notwithstanding
Carbon1674 (talk) 06:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- I might be 2 years late but I agree and the economic times is a shaky source Stanjik (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
This article is biased and doesn't use RS
in the combat use there is a source from ndtv,twitter (not RS) Stanjik (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.