Talk:Blue Line (BART)

	Blue Line (BART) was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 5, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Mid-importance). California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Blue Line (BART).

Actually, the line passes through Castro Valley, but not Hayward, if one looks at a detailed enough map. -- MCB 22:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

The prose isn't bad, per se, but the entire article is just a list. At best, there's a bit on the SamTrans controversy. A good article should cover all the bases of a topic, which means that there should be mentions of where trains are usually stored on this line, when this line was built, who built this line, when was it proposed, etc. etc. The references are also lacking, with a whopping two sources. Also, the lead is way too short for a Good Article. Not to mention that this article was designated a stub for a reason. With time, I'm sure this article can come a long way. Pandacomics 11:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Having SamTrans no longer involved with the operation of BART's San Mateo extension is better for BART's San Mateo passengers. More frequent BART service in San Mateo County is one example. Does everyone agree?
Native94080 (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Native94080Reply

That information is not needed at all. —Kurykh 01:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree, the information is irrelevant. Why don't you remove it? Native94080 (talk) 20:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

...is currently listed as:

underground, elevated, at grade, underwater (Transbay Tube)

That doesn't seem right.--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• BART web map effective September 2005.gif

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:40, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply