Talk:Bionic Commando Rearmed

The article says there will be no Nazi references like the original US version, but the ending had you fight a re-animated Hitler. Is that going to stay the sam

Talk:Bionic Commando Rearmed
Good articleBionic Commando Rearmed has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 12, 2010WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 9, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

What about Hitler?

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article says there will be no Nazi references like the original US version, but the ending had you fight a re-animated Hitler. Is that going to stay the same? XAlpha (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It will probably be Master-D again, but without a Hitler picture. 82.217.174.228 (talk) 19:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Controversy?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What's so bad about keeping the game more true to it's original Japanese version? I think the only people it'd be offensive towards are neo-Nazis themselfs. But is it that the censorship was the reason why it sold so well in America? Because it was "orriginal" with it's storyline and not just gameplay?

What are you talking about? I fail to understand the point you're trying to make. -Xeon25 (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Guessing it's because there are still people in this world who would throw a fit if they nazi referece was left in the game even in the later version...that or Grin didn't want to take a chance with the (non-japanese) players who don't what their game story content changed thowing hissy fits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.126.226 (talk) 16:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Release Date

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The release date hasn't been set as far as I know, although reports from various gaming-news sites (e.g. 1up, GameFAQs, IGN, Gamespot) had stated that the game would be released either: Q2 2008, or May, 2008. Obviously, most of this month has passed, so a delay is likely, but I've yet to see a firm "reschedule" anywhere on the web, including the above websites as of this edit. (Hence my call for atrribution.) Furthermore, even on the Official Bionic Commando website run by Capcom, the only information concerning the launch was that it would be released "in spring 2008." (www.bioniccommando.com/us/pages/BCR_Game_Overview)

(p.s. I'm new at editing, although I'm self education myself through the various "How to's". Please be understanding if I've stepped on anyone's toes...) Oh, and I'm gonna set up an account soon. UPDATE: 5/30/08 According to the Official BCR website, the release date is now "TBA." This was mentioned on a BCR Podcast, and is reported elsewhere as well, (such as here: http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/52718) RlndGunslinger (talk) 00:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edited EU release date since this was not release in EU as of yet (typical).

"Over the Top Voice Acting"

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Regarding the statement about voice acting, seeing as all dialog is presented as text I don't see how that is an accurate statement. JettaMann (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could be a reference to the voice-over in the trailer (and soundtrack) which is almost like a parody of Pablo Franciscos trailer parodies. "Two times the action, two times the excitement, two thirds the dimensions!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.192.139 (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Development Art

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Shinkiro being an artist isn't a "Gameplay Enhancement". Maybe move this to Development history? stealthrabbi (talk) 20:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Bionic Arm Change

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hmm..it's amazing how even in the wikipedia no one seems to notice the bionic arm changes in the remake version and the origional NES version. Is it really that unnoitceable that it does not need to be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.126.226 (talk) 16:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you can find a source providing the information, feel free to add it to the article and cite it. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 09:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

censorship

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The game is only censored in japan, not europe, so i have edited --89.167.221.3 (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bionic Commando Rearmed/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Brambleclawx 13:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The song is not featured on all versions of the soundtrack"- does this mean it was not featured on any soundtrack, or was it on some, but not all?
    I removed the statement. I can't find anything to support it. --Teancum (talk) 12:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Mentions both praise and criticism in a neutral way. Good job.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I'm a little concerned about the third image. The source seems kind of weak, and I think that both images before it have some demonstration of the art style. I would just advise to remove it. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Most definitely disagree there. Demonstration of the art style used by a well known artist in the game would seem to be an integral thing to include in the article. I can beef up the rationale, but I'm very much against removing it. In fact, so much so I'd rather it fail GAN than be removed. The other two images don't accurately portray the art style used by cutscenes. I'm not sure if you played the game or not, but it's very clear if you have. --Teancum (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
    I agree somewhat with the above statement... but I can also see the merits of having the image included in the article (namely, a more close-up view of the character art). I'll let you decide whether to remove it or not. Brambleclawx 00:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Well written, good coverage of aspects of the game. Well done. In terms of further improvement, I would suggest looking for more scholarly sources (though I understand that scholars aren't likely to be writing papers on video games, so that may be difficult), and brushing up the prose a bit more. Brambleclawx 14:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply


Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bionic Commando Rearmed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bionic Commando Rearmed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.