Talk:Bell's theorem

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics Mid‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale. Physics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 1.

To @Johnjbarton and the Wikipedia community: I would like to clarify my recent edit under the name "自然科学研究所." I acknowledge that my earlier submission included a secondary reference (JCTN) that triggered the automated system tag for predatory open access journals. I sincerely apologize for the confusion caused by this noise. To fully resolve this issue, **I have completely removed the JCTN reference.** The updated entry relies strictly and solely on the core paper published in '''Progress In Electromagnetics Research M (JPIER M, 2017)'''. JPIER is a well-established, fully reputable, peer-reviewed journal founded under the lineage of MIT professors, and it is entirely free from any predatory flags. As you requested in your revert comment (*"Please discuss this addition in the Talk page"*), I am presenting the rigorous mathematical physics of this local deterministic framework here: 1. '''Mathematical Premises:''' This model strictly maintains the non-negativity of the classical probability density ${\displaystyle \rho (\lambda )}$ (which corresponds to the statistical distribution of initial phases or polarization angles from the source particles) and maintains strict statistical independence and locality, avoiding superdeterminism or retrocausality. 2. '''The Mechanism:''' It modifies Bell's specific algebraic assumption that individual measurement outcomes inside the hidden layers must be independently fixed classical scalar values. Instead, the polarizer's setting is modeled as physically changing the surrounding local potential field (phase configuration) to trigger a local gauge-like interaction (extending the Aharonov–Bohm effect) with the incoming photon. 3. '''Indefinite Metric Space:''' When computing the joint detection probability, these interactions are evaluated via the '''Minkowski inner product''' (utilizing ${\displaystyle {\text{diag}}(1,-1,-1,-1)}$). This is a standard mathematical tool used in quantum field theory for covariant gauge quantization (e.g., the Gupta–Bleuler formalism). Because this peer-reviewed paper demonstrates that a local and deterministic process governed by spacetime geometry can perfectly reproduce the EPR correlation and automatically ensure the Tsirelson bound (${\displaystyle 2{\sqrt {2}}}$), it serves as a highly relevant alternative interpretation alongside standard non-local mechanics (WP:NPOV). Since the automated system tag has been completely cleared by removing the JCTN reference, I ask for your understanding in allowing this clean, JPIER M-backed entry to remain in the "Interpretations" section. I welcome any constructive discussion here. Thank you. --自然科学研究所 (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not the place to advertise your research. It looks like your paper has never been cited, so including it is a violation of WP:DUE. Tercer (talk) 09:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Bell's theorem revisited has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 17 § Bell's theorem revisited until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply