Talk:Atari Cosmos

There is no evidence to suggest that the system was ever "flawed". It was heavily criticized, yes, but that's not the same thing as having an inherent defect. A

Talk:Atari Cosmos

Comment

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is no evidence to suggest that the system was ever "flawed". It was heavily criticized, yes, but that's not the same thing as having an inherent defect. As a result, I've changed the language to better match the known facts presented by Atari Museum and others.

yeah. I wish they released it cuz it would have changed history. but they didn't. As a result, 3D is not what it used to mean. :( Hmmfomtgal <3 (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Modus operandi??

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Acc to [1]: "But by putting on a clever overlay, the system would produce a holographic image. Each of the nine games would consist of both a cartridge and an overlay to put on the screen. " This means that a new dedicated overlay would have to be put for each game which is different from what the article states "the cartridges only contained the holographic images and a notch to identify what game it was." Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 01:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

What Culture is not considered a reliable source (see WP:RSNP). Regardless, their description is incorrect. oknazevad (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.