Talk:Archie Moore

→ Help pick the next article for collaboration.

Talk:Archie Moore

Moore's daughter

Somebody needs to create an article on her career.

Article Touchup

In case anybody happens to care, I did some major touch-ups on this article, but don't panic, it's not nearly as bad as the diff page makes it look! :) I didn't actually change the substance of any statements (or at least, I tried not to), I just reworded everything to try and make it flow better and stuff like that. Eaglizard 05:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC) BuY THIS BOOK! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.0.49 (talk) 21:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Age of Archie Moore

For the hundreth time: Archie Moore was born in 1916.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Human:8995

Moore claimed that he was born December 13, 1916, but his mother said that he was born December 13, 1913. Moore joked, "I have given this a lot of thought and have decided that I must have been three when I was born." The U.S. Census record from 1920 seems to put an end to the mystery. "Archie L. Wright" is listed as a nephew in the household of Cleveland Moore and was three years and two months old on the date of the census - January 2, 1920. It also states that he was born in Mississippi.

This was published in The Ring Magazine, and that is the source for boxrec.

Fightdane (talk) 06:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fight record inconsistencies in table

I've come across this article while fixing random citation errors. I see there is an inconsistency in the Record column of the article's table. From the bottom of the table upward until the fight against Chuck Vickers (09/11/1937), the Record column shows Archie Moore's cumulative record up to and including that fight. Later than that date, however, the Record column shows his opponent's fight record. I don't know which way is supposed to be the norm but looking at the Wikipedia articles for a few other fighters, it looks like the Record column should show Moore's cumulative record, not that of his opponent. So, an interested editor should probably fix the column for all of those incorrect rows (about 200 or so, I suppose). Of course, that raises the question of whether the table is fully complete with all of Moore's fights. Stamptrader (talk) 11:11, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK, an amendment to what I said above is needed - there doesn't appear to be full consistency across Wikipedia with regard to how the Record column is handled. Some major boxers like Muhammad Ali and Floyd Patterson have their cumulative fight record shown. Other boxers like Pete Rademacher and Giulio Rinaldi have only their opponent's record shown. I don't know which way is right, but I'm sure it isn't supposed to be a mix of the two. Stamptrader (talk) 11:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archie Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Archie Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Archie vs Joey photo

That photo is clearly manipulated, the source is an ebay link that leads nowhere... The fact that it is so clearly doctored sent me down a rabbit hole because I didn't trust the photo to be real. (I trust the details, but the clearly, weirdly altered photo.. Not so much)

That shouldn't be what happens... At least in my opinion. 2603:7080:9305:23A:F92C:4478:4C4B:7ED2 (talk) 01:06, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

You’re right it, he is photoshopped in. I’ll just ping the original uploader, @Materialscientist, to get his thoughts. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.