These have been moved here for reference. I hope the reviewer doesn't mind. :-) -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archie Jackson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Archie Jackson is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
I do believe he was known for being a great stylist, something which the article doesn't mention at the moment. Done, needs another read tomorrow
Also, it's unusual to see family info and early years in the lead, since normally the details about parents and immigration doesn't go in the lead and only the main cricket highlights and adult stuff goes in the lead. Done removed, although left the child prodigy line.
Also I believe I spotted a mistake, since I believe Jackson played 4 Tests against the WI. Done
I think it's normal that for numbers less than tell, we spell out the word, so I would always use "nine matches" or "three wickets" unless it is "3/24" etc. Done
We normally use ndashes for the years and the series results. I changed some of them. Done
In some parts of the article I think it gets a bit weaselly when it simply says the tour was successful or bad without really explaining why. Done, I think.
I guess more detail in his Test century would be good if possible. Done
It is unusual is that you didn't explain the results on the WI series. Done
I would also have the book in the separate ref section and quote the page individually rather than citing the general book over and over, eg, Arthur Morris. Done
IN some parts the exact illness isn't specified. It would be good to specify I guess, unless all these long breaks were caused by the common cold or such generalities.
Nearly all related to the tuberculosis and psoriasis. Needs to be worked into the article better. Done, I think
I would increase the lead a bit. Done - reworded almost entirely.
Some suggestions:
the text is a bit too reliant on one source (ie Frith), here are some others that will help: [1][2][3][4]. Done, I think the Frith work has been toned down a lot. As the definitive biography, I find that many of the other sources I have found refer back to Frith anyway.
A couple of facts are wrong: Jackson scored 162 and 90 v SA in 28-29 just before his Test debut, not a ton in each innings; Done aaargh, I need to read more carefully!
Bradman got 334 at Headingley, not 344; Done, a typo
the test trial in 28-29 was not NSW v MCC, it was Aus XI v Rest of Aus XI [5]. Done This was in the article but I have made it clearer now
I think its important to point out that Jackson batted both as an opener and down the order. Done
A good anecdote is that Ryder asked Kippax if he should let Jackson open on his debut. Not done, I can't seem to find a source to allow inclusion. It would be a good anecodote if one could be found
His innings in 1930 at the Oval with Bradman is significant in that this was the genesis for bodyline; it also won the match and was Jackson's most significant Test knock apart from his debut. Good summary of his 1930 tour here: [7] Match report for Oval Test here: [8]. Done
Finally, Jackson's 164 is the second highest on debut for Aus, only one run short of Bannerman in 1877, which is remarkable that he has held this record so long. See: [9] Done, now included
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have passed this article upon reviewing it against the good article criteria. Although there are further minor fixes needed before progressing to FAC, if such a thing occurs, at the moment I have no doubt it meets all the criteria for a good article. Nice work, Daniel01:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Style quotes
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
From Frith
"You can feel intuitively that he is a cultured batsman; every now and then he lets us see a shot that none but the elect can ever hope to perform." Neville Cardus, on the 1930 tour.
And then finally Bill (Bill Hunt) arranged to show a brief cine-film of Archie Jackson playing his range of strokes on the No 2 ground at Sydney over forty summers before. There he stood, bat held high on the handle, his cap-peak drooping like a guardsman's. The casual elegance of his leg glances, the whalebone suppleness of his wrists as he steered the ball square and backward, the lightness of footwork, the ballet-like inclination of the body as he cover-drove–the artistry, enhanced by a beguiling self-consciousness, burned an impression on my mind." Frith himself. -- Mattinbgn\talk08:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
"t was then that Jackson revealed his great powers. The position did not seem to trouble him in the slightest, and he drove, cut and hit to leg with the utmost certainty and confidence. Ryder helped him to add 126, Bradman stayed while 82 were put on, and then 60 more came in fifty minutes before his superb innings ended at 287. Jackson batted for five hours and twenty minutes, gave no chance, and hit fifteen fours, seven threes and twenty-three twos." from Wisden. -- Mattinbgn\talk08:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Main page goal
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
What is his cause of death? Saying he had a massive haemorrhage is pretty vague. Did he cut his hand? Did he fall on an axe? Did he get struck by lightning? Clicking on the link "haemorrhage" doesn't narrow it down for the layman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.46.223 (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I thought it was clear in context, he bled massively into his lungs as a result of his tuberculosis (discussed extensively in the paras above) and died. Now clarified. -- Mattinbgn\talk06:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Some missed vandalism
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
An IP editor made these changes. I assume they are all incorrect and they have been missed and mixed up with subsequent edits and reversions. It needs a clear head to review and correct as necessary. Bleakcomb (talk) 12:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
At the age of 15 years and one month, he made his first grade début for Balmain; cricket historian David Frith believes that Jackson is the youngest cricketer to play at this level.
Eh?! He played for Australia, but that doesn't stop him being Scottish. He's a Scottish cricketer who played for Australia - where's the problem? I think you should differentiate between Scottish cricketers and cricketers for Scotland. Two different things.--MacRusgail (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
No, he is an Australian cricketer who was born in Scotland. He is Scottish, no doubt and he is a cricketer as well, but that does not make him a Scottish cricketer any more than it makes Ted Dexter a Italian cricketer or Corné Krige and George Gregan Zambian rugby players! His Scottishness and his career as a cricket player are entirely unconnected. Indeed there is no evidence that I can find that he ever played a single game of cricket in Scotland. -- Mattinbgn\talk19:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Strike all the above. If the Scots are that desperate to claim Jackson as a Scottish cricketer, then fine. Personally I think it is ridiculous, but if it keeps the peace ... -- Mattinbgn\talk05:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Source material
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Archie Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.