This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Balkan / European / Classical / Medieval This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Balkan military history task force (c. 500 – present) European military history task force Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD) Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

A good idea for merger, but which way? If time based, we start with the classical, Angaria, it's derivation and history, and move to the "modern" contraction/transliteration, with it's implications. Cambridge Paul (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with the proposed merger. Angaria is the seizure of services, Angary of property. These are two different things. Macduff (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've just noticed that this proposed merger has been in place for almost a year, with very little discussion. If there are no additional comments, I will remove the proposal in short order. Macduff (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

From the Article, with suspect line italicized:

"...though belonging to companies or private persons, may be used for military operations, but 'must be restored at the conclusion of peace and indemnities paid for them.'"

Should this not read "at the conclusion of war"? Can someone verify the wording from the document? It would seem to a casual observer that this says they have to give back the siezed property when peace ends, that is when the war starts, which seems counterintuitive. 71.201.126.157 (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This article was written with a lot of technical terms that make it difficult for laymen to understand. It should be edited at least to reflect that most people looking at it may not understand it’s meaning. (I did, but even I had to look one up.) A way of doing so might be to use examples, rather than verbatim translation (that might even make less sense).174.25.142.178 (talk) 21:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)A REDDSONReply