Talk:Actian NoSQL Object Database

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

The content of Versant Corporation was merged into Actian NoSQL Object Database on 17 June 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

An excellent cut and paste from some kind of marketing document. The attempt to achieve a neutral point of view may be hampered in cases by using "we" when describing actions and opinions that must surely attribute to Versant itself or its agents and employees.

The is no mention of the cost of Versant or it's licensing models - surely these represent valuable information in this Wiki page. As much as feature sets and performance issues.

Zschub (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pure marketing. Although the subject is noteworthy otherwise in Wikipedia. Maybe it should be deleted and rewritten from a neutral point of view, evidenced with proper references.

It is too promotional in tone, and this problem existed for far too long. Options are either to edit it down (my preference), delete, or merge to Versant Corporation. Note with the company's apparent demise, should be written into past tense and noted to be historical. W Nowicki (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Versant Object Database. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130817001828/http://odbms.org/download/048.04%20TechView%20Versant.pdf to http://www.odbms.org/download/048.04%20TechView%20Versant.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

A merge of the database and corporate page was proposed in 2016, but no discussion started. The direction isn't obvious, as the company has more than one product, but it seems reasonable that the company could be merged to the product it's most known for. So, I weakly support the merge; either direction should be fine. Klbrain (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Y Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 22:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply