I believe the third paragraph would more accurately describe APNG as a successor or replacement for MNG, not a competitor to it.
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I believe the third paragraph would more accurately describe APNG as a successor or replacement for MNG, not a competitor to it.
My reasons are:
2601:2C6:4F80:3F1:A814:363:24BC:25C3 (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I think this should be better reflected in the article. Benimation (talk) 14:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The simplicity of the format, plus the Specification Revisions, gives a feeling it's just a quick hack of PNG.
Should we mention this ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musaran (talk • contribs) 19:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The table does not yet list ImageMagick. Can someone add whether ImageMagick supports this or not please? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Several say both "Yes" and "Planned". This is obviously lying. If "Planned" is true, then "Support" needs to be "No". TooManyFingers (talk) 22:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.