Talk:ABTS

As an inorganic chemist with no specific expertise in this area, I request clarification of the first sentence of the third paragraph: "The formal reduction pot

Talk:ABTS

Backwards reasoning?

As an inorganic chemist with no specific expertise in this area, I request clarification of the first sentence of the third paragraph: "The formal reduction potentials for ABTS are high enough for it to act as an electron donor for the reduction of . . . ." An electron donor is a reducing agent, which is itself being oxidized. So the reduction half-reaction and the sign of the potential would be reversed. Should it read, "The formal reduction potentials for ABTS are low enough"? Robert Richman 14:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:ABTS/CommentsTalk:ABTS/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Article cleanup == I'm having a bash at cleaning this up in my user space User:Grunkhead/ABTS. For now I'm sorting out the references, adding some specific values for formal redox potentials, and adding uses in the pulp and paper industry. Until that's done, if there are no objections, and until a revised article is back in place, I'm happy to incorporate suggested amendments in my space. Grunkhead (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 12:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.