Talk:704 Hauser

The show's premise reminds me of the situation we've just had with my grandma's house. She died last year, and we had to sell her house. First time in over 10

Talk:704 Hauser

Comment

The show's premise reminds me of the situation we've just had with my grandma's house. She died last year, and we had to sell her house. First time in over 100 years that the house has been outside the family, and even now I can't see anyone but Grandma living there. It was so much a part of my childhood, and now it's gone. I think that's the same thing here with this show. It was painful to not see Archie and his family in that house anymore, and that's why the show upended before too long.

JesseG 22:05, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Joey Stivic

What kind of "disturbing" are we talking about here?

Is it really a spinoff?

704 Hauser is more of a "remake" just as the new Battlestar Galactica was a remake of the original 70s show. (And also how All in the Family was not a spinoff, but a remake of the original BBC show.)

In my opinion it's not exactly a spin-off but more of a soft sequel, as it's very distinctly set in the Bunkers former house, in a neighbourhood that has changed in it's demographics, AND Joey Stivic, a baby in the origional show, is in the first episode as a grown man looking to explore the home he grew up in.

HOME MEDIA

The 6 eppisodes are avaliable for free streaming in Canada on CTV.CA as part of their "Throwback" sitcoms, should that be mentioned on the wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.20.134 (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.