Talk:2013 New Brunswick python attack
How did this get quoted on Google News ? Because currently [1], there is only one sentence in the whole article ! 70.29.248.145 (talk) 22:18, 6 August
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Only one sentence and it's on Google News
How did this get quoted on Google News ? Because currently [1], there is only one sentence in the whole article ! 70.29.248.145 (talk) 22:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikitabloid
This is not encyclopedic. Get a life.
Pzzp (talk) 01:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Of course it's not encylopedic. But that's not a problem, since Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.152.200 (talk) 04:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
This is not a media site
As Pzzp stated, this not encyclopedic content, nor is it truly informative, especially on the matter of pythons and snake safety. Much of the information is also blatantly incorrect. Truly, this article should be faced with deletion as it's not worthy of even existing. Parks1997 (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
"Background" section
I think a Background section would be good to add, explaining who the boys were, the reptile shop, as well as certain details such as possibly how the python was acquired. I'll potentially add it in the future, but here's an article that would be helpful: https://globalnews.ca/news/769386/misplaced-blame-in-nb-python-deaths-former-reptile-ocean-employee/ B3251 (talk) 03:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.