The name “Progalesaurus” is derived from Greek, “pro” meaning before, “gale” meaning weasel or cat, and “saurus” meaning lizard or reptile (Sidor and Smith). The name refers to the relationship Progalesaurus has to the more derived Galesaurus.[1]
Discovery and history
Progalesaurus was originally discovered by Roger M. H. Smith in 1998. The specimen was found in the Sneeuberg mountains near New Lootsberg Pass in the Karoo Basin of South Africa. Progalesaurus was first described in 2004 by Christian A. Sidor and Roger M. H. Smith in their paper titled, “A New Galesaurid (Therapsida: Cynodontia) From the Lower Triassic of South Africa.”
Although no other specimen of Progalesaurus has been found as of yet, Sidor and Smith's findings have been included in many papers on the Permian-Triassic extinction event, cynodont diversity, and the paleoenvironment of South Africa.[2][3]
Description
Progalesaurus was a relatively small mammal-like creature, with the skull of its holotype measuring 9.35 cm in length.[1] It likely closely resembled its early cynodont relatives, walking on four legs and covered in fur.[4]
Skull
Progalesaurus, like Galesaurus, has remarkably large nares compared to other early cynodonts. The nares are formed externally by the premaxilla, the maxilla, and the nasal. The septomaxilla resides inside the nares, on top of the junction between maxilla and premaxilla.
The orbit faces anteriorly and is formed by the lacrimal, prefrontal, jugal, and post orbital. The post orbital notably has a deeply forked posterior margin. This characteristic is seen in some other basal cynodonts, but is widely variable.[1]
The maxilla forms a good portion of the side of the face and is dotted with small foramina, mostly above the canines. These foramina likely housed nerves, and were perhaps associated with whiskers.[4] The nasal is also dotted with tiny foramina.[1]
Progalesaurus has a parietal foramen, which is used for light sensing in extant taxa.[5] Posterior to the parietal foramen the parietals are fused, forming a sagittal crest. The crest narrows posterior to the foramen like Galesaurus and Cynosaurus, and unlike more derived cynodonts.
Progalesaurus, like Galesaurus, Cynosaurus, and Thrinaxodon, possesses a large zygomatic arch. Under this arch, in posterior view, lies a foramen associated with the outer ear tube. Compared to cynognathians such as Cynognathus or Diademodon, the foramen is relatively shallow.
Progalesaurus does not have a fully-formed secondary palate,[1] which serves to separate the airway from food-processing.[6]
Dentition
The mandible of Progalesaurus is very similar to that of Galesaurus, with its teeth setting it apart from other cynodonts. Progalesaurus has a dental formula of I4/3, C1/1, PC7?/9. The upper incisors are long and thin, with a circular cross-section. The lower incisors are shorter than their upper counterparts. The incisors have an oval cross-section and longitudinal striations. Their upper canine’s edges are preserved well enough to conclude they lack serration, but the lower canines are not still sharp enough to make any conclusions about their serration. The lower canines are slightly longer than the upper canines.
The post-canine teeth are, as of now, the most distinct feature of Progalesaurus. The recurved main cusp resembles Galesaurus, Cynosaurus, and Probelesodon, however the number and placement of the accessory cusps are unique. The upper post-canines are poorly preserved, but the teeth that are well-enough preserved to see accessory cusps have at least one posterior to the main recurved cusp each. The bottom post-canines are extremely well preserved. The teeth get progressively lower and anteroposteriorly longer from front to back. The buccal surface of each post-canine is smooth. The teeth are also slightly angled so that the posterior of one tooth contacts the anterior of the next. The posterior accessory cusps of teeth 2 and 3 curve upwards towards the top of the tooth. The 4th tooth shows posterior accessory cusps as well as at least one cusp mesial to the main cusp. The 5th tooth only shows one posterior accessory cusp, but the lack of other accessory cusps is “probably due to wear.” The 6th tooth on to the 9th tooth have multiple posterior accessory cusps as well as at least one mesial cusp.[1]
Post-cranial skeleton
Very little post-cranial skeleton is preserved in the holotype for Progalesaurus. Only the right scapula and the left atlantal neural spine were recovered. Each of these elements closely resemble those of Thrinaxodon.[1]
Classification
Progalesaurus is a galesaurid, belonging to the clade Epicynodontia. As an epicynodont, Progalesaurus belongs to the greater clade Cynodontia. Cynodonts are therapsids, which in turn belong to the greater group Synapsida, and the even broader Amniota.[1]
Early cynodonts like Progalesaurus likely had large litters, as more derived cynodonts like Tritylodontid have been found with litters far larger than modern mammals. Early cynodonts have also been preserved with juveniles, suggesting they provided parental care to their young after birth or hatching.[7]
Progalesaurus likely burrowed, as closely related taxa like Thrinaxodon and Galesaurus have been found in burrows of their own making. Burrowing probably helped Triassic cynodonts to avoid harsh above-ground conditions shortly after the Permian-Triassic extinction event.[8] Early cynodonts have even been found in burrows with other taxa, indicating they may have cohabitated interspecifically.[9]
Based on tooth shape, paleontologists believe that early cynodonts like Progalesaurus were insectivores and carnivores.[10]Coprolites, or fossilized feces, of cynodonts have also been found and can be used to investigate their diet. One coprolite of a 240 million year old cynodont even preserved parasitic nematode eggs, the earliest evidence of pinworms ever found.[11]
Paleoenvironment
Progalesaurus lived very soon after the devastating Permian-Triassic extinction event in what is modern South Africa. Other cynodonts and potentially even other galesaurids, like Cynosaurus, crossed the extinction boundary.[1] Cynodonts may have been able to survive the mass extinction due to their burrowing behavior,[3] as perhaps living mostly underground would have pre-conditioned these burrowers to the high levels of carbon dioxide and low levels of oxygen present during the extinction event.[8] Cynodont diversity increased relatively rapidly after the extinction event.[2]
The early Triassic period was one of the hottest in the history of the Earth, however the climate in the areas cynodonts have been discovered was more temperate. There were high levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[3] In the Karoo Basin, where Progalesaurus was discovered, there is evidence to suggest the area was a moderately damp open woodland.[12]
In the early Triassic of South Africa, Progalesaurus was accompanied by "survivor fauna," and "recovery fauna." A few examples of (vertebrate) survivor fauna, creatures that crossed the extinction boundary, include Lystrosaurus, Tetracynodon, Moschorhinus, and Ictidosuchoides. Recovery fauna include small amphibians such as Micropholis, Galesaurids, some procolophonoids, and some archosauromorphs such as Proterosuchus.[8]
^ abSmith, Roger; Botha, Jennifer (September 2005). "The recovery of terrestrial vertebrate diversity in the South African Karoo Basin after the end-Permian extinction". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 4 (6–7): 623–636. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.005. ISSN1631-0683.
^ abcAbdala, Fernando; Ribeiro, Ana Maria (February 2010). "Distribution and diversity patterns of Triassic cynodonts (Therapsida, Cynodontia) in Gondwana". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 286 (3–4): 202–217. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.01.011. ISSN0031-0182.
^Benoit, Julien; Abdala, Fernando; Van den Brandt, Marc J.; Manger, Paul R.; Rubidge, Bruce S. (2015-11-04). "Physiological implications of the abnormal absence of the parietal foramen in a late Permian cynodont (Therapsida)". The Science of Nature. 102 (11–12): 69. doi:10.1007/s00114-015-1321-4. ISSN0028-1042. PMID26538062.
^Rubidge, Bruce S.; Sidor, Christian A. (November 2001). "Evolutionary Patterns Among Permo-Triassic Therapsids". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32 (1): 449–480. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114113. ISSN0066-4162.
^Hoffman, Eva A.; Rowe, Timothy B. (2018-08-29). "Jurassic stem-mammal perinates and the origin of mammalian reproduction and growth". Nature. 561 (7721): 104–108. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0441-3. ISSN0028-0836. PMID30158701.
^ abcSmith, Roger; Botha, Jennifer (2005-09-01). "The recovery of terrestrial vertebrate diversity in the South African Karoo Basin after the end-Permian extinction". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 4 (6): 623–636. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.005. ISSN1631-0683.
^ABDALA, F.; CISNEROS, J. C.; SMITH, R. M.H. (2006-10-01). "Faunal Aggregation in the Early Triassic Karoo Basin: Earliest Evidence of Shelter-Sharing Behavior Among Tetrapods?". PALAIOS. 21 (5): 507–512. doi:10.2110/palo.2005.p06-001r. ISSN0883-1351.
^Retallack, G.J. (2004). "Vertebrate extinction across Permian-Triassic boundary in Karoo Basin, South Africa: Reply". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 116 (9): 1295. doi:10.1130/b25614.1. ISSN0016-7606.
