From 2005 to 2019, Ranjan was an equity partner in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, office of K&L Gates, where he litigated commercial, energy, and appellate matters. While at K&L Gates, he served on the firm's global pro bono and diversity committees, and directed his office's pro bono program—which was awarded "pro bono law firm of the year" in 2017 by the local bar association. He is active in the community, serving on legal diversity and symphony boards, as well as serving as a mentor to local middle school students.[1]
On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate, which provides that nominations not acted upon during a session are considered to have expired.[4] On January 23, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to renominate Ranjan for a federal judgeship.[5] His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day.[6] On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 18–4 vote.[7] On July 9, 2019, the Senate invoked cloture on his nomination by an 83–15 vote.[8] On July 10, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by an 80–14 vote.[9] He received judicial commission on July 12, 2019.[10]
Notable rulings
In August 2020, Ranjan ordered the Trump campaign to produce evidence of voter fraud in Pennsylvania by Friday, August 14. The Trump campaign must answer questions from Democratic groups, or admit to having no proof of election fraud. A hearing about the evidence was set for late September.[11] On August 23, 2020, Ranjan issued a stay on the Trump campaign's lawsuit, pending the result of a similar state-level lawsuit.[12]
On October 10, 2020, in the case of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, Ranjan granted judgment in favor of the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar, and denied the Trump campaign's claims of voter fraud and allowed ballot dropboxes to remain in service.[13] In his decision, Ranjan concluded that "the plain language of the [Pennsylvania State] Election Code imposes no requirement for signature comparison for mail-in and absentee ballots and applications," a reasoning that was approvingly cited by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on 23 October.[14]
Awards and recognition
Ranjan has been recognized by Chambers USA as one of the top commercial litigators in Pennsylvania multiple times, and has been a fellow with the Litigation Counsel of America and the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity.[1]
.jpg)
