Due to changes announced on the eve of the 2022 NRL season,[3] the NRL Judiciary is made up of former players who convene in two-man panels to rule on on-field incidents. The judiciary has been chaired by Supreme Court of NSW Justice Geoffrey Bellew since 2015.[4] Bellew has the deciding vote should the panel's verdict not be unanimous.[3]
From 2022, the Match Review Committee deciding on whether charges are issued against players for on-field conduct is managed by former NRL player and video referee Luke Patten.[3]
An integrity unit was formed on 7 February 2013 and is headed by former Federal Court judge Tony Whitlam.[5]
System in place from 1998-2021, this version from 2017-2021.[6] 100 points = 1 match suspension
Offence
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Tripping
$1,500 or 100
200
300
Kicking
200
300
400
Striking
200
300
400
Reckless high tackle
400
500
600
Intentional high tackle
Refer to panel
Careless high tackle
$1,500 or 100
200
300
Dropping Knees
200
300
400
Dangerous Throw
$1,500 or 100
300
500
Contrary conduct
$1,500 or 100
200
300
Detrimental conduct
$1,500 or 100
200
300
Dangerous contact - head/neck
100
300
500
Dangerous contact - other
100
200
300
Shoulder charge
200
350
500
Crusher tackle
200
350
500
History
The NRL Judiciary was formed in 1998 after the reunification of the game in Australia, following the Super League war. Judiciary hearings were generally held on Tuesday nights, following the completion of each round of matches. Charges would be laid against players by the NRL Match Review Committee (MRC), originally chaired from 1998–2003 by judiciary commissioner Jim Hall. Hall was originally appointed by Super League to be that competition's judiciary commissioner, and was joined by Graham Annesley and Ron Massey to form the MRC.[7]
The MRC would review incidents where players were either sent off or reported by the referee; subject to a complaint by an opposition club, or another source; or observed by the MRC. If a charge was warranted, the MRC would grade the serious of the offence and players and clubs would have the opportunity to take an early guilty plea to avoid a hearing. If the player chose the defend the charge, the hearing would be held by the NRL Judiciary under chairman Greg Woods and a panel of former players.[7]
The hearing would be similar to a jury trial where the chairman provides rulings and direction to the panel members, and after hearing the evidence the panel members would deliberate. If found guilty the table of demerit point penalties would determine the number of matches players would be suspended after the verdict.[7]
Jim Hall would be sacked as judiciary commissioner in January 2004 by then NRL CEO David Gallop, with the league splitting the role after a number of controversies during the 2003 NRL season.[8]
^ abcMcKewen, Trevor, ed. (17 June 1998). "The NRL Judiciary - A plain English guide". Big League. 79 (16). Sydney, New South Wales: Pacific Publications Pty Ltd: 24–25.