The absence of a siphuncle in K. antarcticus has been taken as evidence against cephalopod ancestry, as factors that would allow a siphuncle to penetrate preexisting septal chambers remain unknown. The prevailing argument suggests that a strand of tissue remained attached to the previous septum as the mollusc moved forwards and deposited its next septum, stopping that new septum from closing completely and becoming mineralised itself.[3]
Ten or more septa are found in mature individuals, occupying around a third of the shell – septa form very early and have been found in specimens as small as 2 mm in length.[4]
Unlike monoplacophoran fossils, there is no evidence of muscle scarring in Knightoconus fossils.[4] Scars from the closely related Hypseloconus have been used to determine its orientation.[5]Knightoconus started life with an exogastric shell, that becomes endogastric as the organism grew.[6]
^ abcdYochelson, E.L.; Flower, R.H.; Webers, G.F. (1973). "The bearing of the new Late Cambrian monoplacophoran genus Knightoconus upon the origin of the Cephalopoda". Lethaia. 6 (3): 275–309. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1973.tb01199.x.
^ abWebers, G.F.; Yochelson, E.L. (1989). "Late Cambrian molluscan faunas and the origin of the Cephalopoda". In Crame, J.A. (ed.). Origins and Evolution of the Antarctic Biota. Special Publications. Vol. 47. London, UK: Geological Society. p. 29. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.047.01.04. S2CID128682549.
^Peel, J. S. (1991). "Functional Morphology of the Class Helcionelloida Nov., and the Early Evolution of the Mollusca". In Simonetta, A. M.; Conway Morris, S (eds.). The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa. Cambridge University Press. pp. 157–177. ISBN978-0-521-40242-2.