You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti
Submission declined on 13 August 2026 by Sulfurboy (talk).
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Comment: For the record, I declined the speedy tag and removed it on procedural grounds (the hoax tag was applied to the draft talk page, not the draft). If such a tag were applied to the draft, I'd decline because IMHO this is a situation which deserves more eyes, not fewer. On one hand, a desire to right great wrongs (revealing this "miracle") is usually a flawed basis upon which build pagespace. On the other, we can see some serious sourcing already present. Using the best of such citation, I'd suggest User:Octavius1981 create an 1-2 sentence entry in the appropriate space on Weeping statues, whatever the outcome on this draft. Creating such an entry may well prove useful with culling connected material from the draft here as well. Finally, the self-created image of the old color photograph does not do the pagespace any favors. BusterD (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: It should be noted that we already have an article on weeping statues, and given that the claims made in relation to this one appear not to be materially different to the many others covered there, any discussion of these particular events would almost certainly be better covered there. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Future reviewers should be aware of this editors demeanor with other reviewers demonstrated here and hereSulfurboy (talk) 02:51, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Rejected for a couple of reasons - first is the lack of neutral POV and encyclopedic tone. The current form of the article asserts that these are supernatural events which occurred, which fails the neutral POV test - it needs to be rewritten to describe what was reported, without taking a position on whether these were genuine miracles or not. In addition, some of the references checked do not actually link to what the references claim - the citation to the U.S. News & World Report actually links to a YouTube video for example. Other sources are too short to be of use establishing notability. Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:55, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I won't call this outright a hoax, but I will say that to qualify for an encyclopaedia article, we need considerably better sources than hear-say and supposition. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Historical miraculous event in Virginia
Weeping Statue
The main weeping statue, at St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Church in Lake Ridge, Virginia, from 1991-1993.
The Seton Miracles were unexplained, paranormal or supernatural phenomena that occurred in connection with Fr. James C. Bruse at St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Catholic Church in Lake Ridge, Virginia, from 1991 to 1993. They became national news, and a Catholic pilgrimage destination for people seeking to see the weeping statues and the priest's stigmata.
Background
Rev. James C. Bruse
Fr. James C. Bruse, was born Oct. 28, 1954, in Washington, D.C. He graduated from the then-college of Mary Washington in 1976, and entered formation for the Diocese of Arlington in 1979. After graduating from its Mount St. Mary’s Seminary in 1983, he was ordained a priest on May 12, 1984, by its then-bishop, John Keating.[1] He had once held three world records for marathon roller-coaster riding.[2]
Events
Claimed Miracles
Weeping Statues
Dozens[3] or Hundreds[4] of statues were witnessed to weep from their eyes, especially when placed into the presence of Fr. Bruse, usually a clear liquid, but occasionally a bloodlike liquid.[3][5][6] The statues were usually statues of the blessed Virgin Mary, or Jesus, but occasionally other saints' statues would cry.[7][8] Statues also wept at other parishes, in the priest's presence.[9][10][11] Many statues also changed colors.[12][7][4][13]
Stigmata
Fr. Bruse received the stigmata, which appeared as painful, red, dime-size dots on his wrists, feet, and side.[14][3] They would occasionally bleed.[7][15] Even when not visible they caused a "stabbing, jamming" pain in Fr. Bruse, which "No medicine will help - Advil, aspirin."[7] Bruse was reportedly examined by a doctor, and verifiedly examined by a Psychiatrist, who wrote a lengthy report, and "the priest came out of his lengthy interview with an excellent bill of health".[7]
Other Phenomena
There were also reports of the facial expressions of the statues changing, statues changing colour, rosaries changing colour, the fragrance of roses filling the Church, and many other supposedly supernatural occurrences.[4][16]
The Washington Post described it as a "Lourdes-Like Pilgrimage."[34] Thousands of people came weekly to see the phenomena,[35][25][36][37] from all over the nation[22], and world.[38][39] Police officers were regularly needed to direct traffic[35], as even tour-busses tried to fit into the residential neighborhood.[36][27][25] Fr. Bruse would often bless statues and other items, brought by curiosity-seeking pilgrims.[7][40][34]
Aftermath
The Diocese of Arlington never made any decision as to the events' authenticity. However, concerned at the circus-like atmosphere, Bishop Keating eventually suppressed the events, notwithstanding that the statues went on crying, for some time.[37] Fr. Bruse and the Parish's lives returned to normal, and the reputation of the events was discarded, as if trivial or inconsequential. In 1995 he was transferred to a different parish.[25][26] Fr. Bruse went on to a long and successful career, in the Diocese of Arlington, at numerous other parishes.[1][41]
Explanation
Reputed Miraculous Character
Skeptics sometimes described the events as mere paranormal "phenomena"[31][20][42][43], but news stories vacilated over the obvious question of whether they were more, were actual "supernatural" "miracles,"[44] as believers frequently claimed.[45][46] Paradoxical headlines appeared, such as,
For Many, a Firm Belief in Miracles; Those Stirred by Pr. William Phenomena...[22]
Consequently, the name "Seton Miracles" has become the common name for the event.[47][48][49] Rarely, an alternate name, "Our Lady of the Potomac," is used.[50]
"Anyway, The Washington Post sent out a team of reporters, who produced a strange story about the phenomenon of these weeping statues: they obviously did not want to appear so unsophisticated as to believe this nonsense, but neither could they find any explanation for it. As far as they could tell, the young priest was not a charlatan and puddles of water did indeed appear at the feet of the statues. . . . But the thought occurred to me: Why wasn't that church absolutely packed with non-believers, seeking to determine whether there might be something to this Catholic religion? Or why weren't The Washington Post reporters enthusiastic converts? Well, of course, the wisdom of the world does not operate that way: The wise do not investigate such silliness—and even if the miracle were performed under their nose, they would disbelieve. You may recall the parable of Dives, the rich man, and Lazarus the beggar . . . [in which] Abraham rejoins, "If they hear not Moses and prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one [miraculously] rose from the dead."[51]
Unknown Causes
Fr. Bruse himself professed more ignorance than knowledge of the explanation or reasons behind the phenomena, acknowledging that "I would be just as cynical. I would be questioning this."[3] Once he said, "I think what's happening is, Christ is saying, `Hey, I'm here. This is real.'"[7] Another time he elaborated,
"Look," he says, "I would never believe this kind of thing, normally. I've heard stuff like this. Maybe it's plaster sweating, maybe it's hysterical reaction on the part of the observers. For skeptics, I know how they feel. That's what I'm trying to say. It's not me. It's Christ. It's Christ working through me. It's all His work. It's Mary's work. Mary is a big factor. She's interceding here somehow."[7]
The fact that no purportedly supernatural message accompanied the phenomena, to explain them, figured into Bishop Keating's decision to ignore,[37] and ultimately suppress the event.[52][27]
References
^ ab"Who's your new pastor?". The Arlington Catholic Herald. Catholic Diocese of Arlington. 13 June 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
^ abcCarney, James L. "The Seton Miracles". The Marian Foundation. Retrieved 31 May 2026. ...hundreds of statues of the Blessed Virgin Mary were reported weeping before thousands of astonished witnesses. Some statues added or rotated colors. Numerous rosaries changed color. Some people reported seeing the "miracle of the sun" while others noticed a powerful scent of roses when there were no flowers or other reasons for such a fragrance.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. The tears looked like blood.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. Before long, parishioners began whispering of other inexplicable events -- spinning suns, rays of vibrant colors, statues and rosaries changing colors and amazing healings.
^Adams, Cecil (19 February 1998). "The Straight Dope". The Chicago Reader. Retrieved 11 August 2026.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026.
^ abRosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. Hathitrust. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. Note: This source is currently protected by copyright, so only text-searches are permitted.
^ abRosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. But if he [the bishop] discourages the faithful from believing, he risks driving away the thousands whom the miracles have drawn to mass. . . . Even so, 3,000 people mobbed the church the following Sunday, spilling out the doors, trampling the daffodils and jamming the streets so badly that two county police officers were called in to direct traffic.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. Their doubts in no way affected the faithful, who now arrived daily from as far away as Japan.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. At the request of U.S. News, a Virginia medical laboratory recently tested a sample of one statue's 'tears' and found no evidence of the salt and proteins present in human tears. Beyond that, there is no objective physical documentation -- at least none made public -- to prove or disprove the phenomena.
^Rosellini, Lynn (29 March 1993). "The Case of the Weeping Madonna". U.S. News & World Report. Vol. 114, no. 12. pp. Cover–page, 46–55. Retrieved 2 June 2026. Long before the word 'miracle,' . . . 'Is it a miracle? Is it a miracle? . . . But a few months later, a California astrophysicist named Shawn Carlson, who had heard about the 'miracles' of Lake Ridge and other American towns, reproduced a crying statue on the CBS-TV show '48 Hours.'
^Ryan, Stephen (19 December 2010). "Tears of the Virgin Mary Meet the Smoke of Satan". BishopAccountability.org. Retrieved 31 May 2026. Many eye-witnesses to the events and those who have investigated the incident argue that never in the entire history of the Catholic Church, has there been a greater manifestation of the supernatural or momentous occurrence of weeping statues and other physical signs of God's presence through the Blessed Virgin Mary than what took place on the outskirts of Washington, D.C. in 1991 – 1993
^Boorstein, Michelle (6 April 2012). "'The Seton Miracles': Pr. William church weeping statue reports continue to spark interest — but no official inquiry". WashingtonPost.com. Retrieved 12 August 2026. [Note that this story is sometimes listed on the 9th instead of 6th April 2012.] A small group in Northern Virginia and around the country has held fast to what they call The Seton Miracles and some have recently been pushing the diocese http:// www. thepetitionsite. com /1/diocese-of-arlington---investigate-the-seton-miracles/ to open an investigation [Sic: Article text contains that inline link].
^Carney, James L. "The Seton Miracles". The Marian Foundation. Retrieved 31 May 2026. Welcome to The Marian Foundation: The Seton Miracles.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
- promotional language: see Words to watch;
- personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
- informal language.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.