Draft:SER Group

Submission declined on 12 February 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by ChrysGalley 5 months ago. Last edited by Kuru 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 2 September 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Declined by Pythoncoder 11 months ago.

Submission declined on 28 July 2025 by Kovcszaln6 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kovcszaln6 12 months ago.

Submission declined on 26 June 2025 by Rambley (talk). This draft is written in German. This is the English Wikipedia and we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English translation, avoiding machine translation tools (like Google Translate). If you prefer to write in your own language, you may write it in the German Wikipedia. Declined by Rambley 13 months ago.

• Comment: Still reads like a company advertising brochure: this is what the company would like us to know, not an independent summary of reliable sources. Also it's not allowed to have direct links inside articles, they must go via references, see WP:REFB. ChrysGalley (talk) 10:17, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Please carefully review our notability guidelines on organizations before resubmitting. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Helena.reichstein (talk) 13:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Doxis, once known as SER Group^[1], is an international software company specializing in enterprise content management (ECM) and document management (DMS).^[2][3] With its ECM platform Doxis, it enables medium-sized and large companies to manage information and documents.^[4][5] The solutions include document management^[6], HR document management, electronic files, business process automation (BPM), invoice processing, contract management, workflow automation, and the use of artificial intelligence (AI).^[7]

SER Group, now Doxis, was founded in 1984 and originally developed software for office communication. During the 1990s, the company shifted its focus toward electronic archiving and document management systems.

In 2008, the company introduced its enterprise content management platform Doxis^[8], which has since evolved into the Doxis Intelligent Content Automation (ICA) platform. The system now unifies traditional ECM capabilities with AI-enabled services, cloud-based architecture, and no-code workflow design, integrating with ecosystems such as SAP^[9], Salesforce, and Microsoft.

In 2019, The Carlyle Group acquired a significant stake in Doxis to support the company’s international growth and innovation. In 2024, TA Associates^[10] became the new lead investor, with Carlyle remaining a shareholder, to help accelerate Doxis’ global expansion and AI investment.

In 2022, Dr. John Bates, previously Executive Chairman, was appointed CEO. Bates holds a doctorate in computer science^[11] from the University of Cambridge and previously led Eggplant and Plat.One, and founded Apama. As of 2024, the managing partners are Dr. John Bates (CEO), Dr. Gregor Joeris, and Johannes Klutz.

Doxis develops software in the field of enterprise content management (ECM)^[12]. Its main product is the Doxis Intelligent Content Automation Platform, which includes applications for managing document-based business processes. The platform combines traditional ECM functions, such as audit-compliant archiving, with technologies including artificial intelligence^[13], machine learning, and process automation.

In 2025, Doxis made three acquisitions as part of its expansion strategy:

• AFI Solutions GmbH: a company specializing in automated document processes in SAP environments, including invoice, purchase order, and document processing.^{[citation needed]}
• Klippa: a Netherlands-based provider of AI-supported document recognition, data extraction, and automation technologies ^[14].
• Metaforce: Provider of Customer Communication Management (CCM) and Customer Experience Management (CXM) solutions, offering AI-based document generation and personalised communication technologies integrated with the Doxis platform to enhance intelligent content automation.^[15]

In January 2019, the global private equity firm The Carlyle Group acquired a majority stake in Doxis, when still called SER Group^[16].