Draft:Project Drawdown

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti

Draft:Project Drawdown
  • Comment: Please note that you cannot inherit notability. While the Drawdown book and Hawken are notable subjects, I'm not seeing anything compelling here to pass WP:NORG Sulfurboy (talk) 19:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)


Project Drawdown
Founded2014
FounderPaul Hawken
Type501(c)(3) nonprofit
Location
Executive director
Jonathan Foley
Websitedrawdown.org

Project Drawdown is an American nonprofit organization that researches and publishes analyses of climate change mitigation measures. It takes its name from "drawdown", the point at which greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere stop rising and begin to decline.[1] The organization is best known for the 2017 book Drawdown, which ranked 100 existing technologies and practices by their modelled potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.[2]

History

Project Drawdown was founded in 2014 by the environmentalist and author Paul Hawken.[3] Hawken assembled a group of several hundred researchers and practitioners to model the emissions impact of individual mitigation measures, work published as the book Drawdown in 2017.[4] The book became a New York Times bestseller.[5] The climate scientist Jonathan Foley, previously executive director of the California Academy of Sciences, succeeded Hawken as executive director in 2019.[6] The organization is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, originally based in San Francisco and now headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota[7]; it is funded by individual and institutional donations.[1][8]

Research and publications

Project Drawdown maintains a database of climate solutions, each assessed for its potential emissions reduction, cost and financial return under scenarios consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C.[1] The organization does not conduct primary research; it synthesises published data and models the aggregate effect of deploying each measure at scale.[9] The methodology was set out in the 2017 book and updated in The Drawdown Review (2020), which revised the earlier rankings and grouped measures under three headings: reducing sources of emissions, supporting natural carbon sinks, and improving society.[10] In 2023 the organization published the Drawdown Roadmap, which argues for sequencing solutions by sector, geography and timing rather than treating them as an undifferentiated list.[11] Staff researchers have published in peer-reviewed journals, including a 2022 review in The Lancet Planetary Health examining overlaps between climate mitigation measures and human development outcomes.[8]

Reception

Reviewing Drawdown in Science, the economist Faye Duchin called it an ambitious project while questioning aspects of its approach; Duchin's own earlier modelling of plant-rich diets had reached different conclusions from those of the Drawdown team.[12] Writing in GreenBiz, the sustainable-finance analyst Sasja Beslik argued that Project Drawdown had omitted capital reallocation and socially responsible investing from its rankings, contending that shifting investment away from carbon-intensive companies would outrank several of the solutions the organization listed.[13] Researchers have also adapted the framework to smaller jurisdictions. A team led by the energy policy scholar Marilyn A. Brown at the Georgia Institute of Technology used Project Drawdown's global solution set as the starting point for "Drawdown Georgia", a state-level analysis published in Environmental Management that identified 20 measures suited to the state and discussed the strengths and limitations of translating a global framework to a subnational scale.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "Mission and Impact". Project Drawdown. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. ^ Roberts, David (2017-05-10). "This book ranks the top 100 solutions to climate change. The results are surprising". Vox. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. ^ Gunther, Marc (2014-10-22). "First look: environmental entrepreneur Paul Hawken's long-awaited new book". The Guardian. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  4. ^ Schlossberg, Tatiana (2017-06-12). "How Much Do You Know About Solving Global Warming?". The New York Times. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  5. ^ Worrall, Simon (2017-05-28). "100 Practical Ways to Reverse Climate Change". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2019-09-03. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  6. ^ "Jonathan Foley, Ph.D." Project Drawdown. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  7. ^ "Contact Project Drawdown". Project Drawdown.
  8. ^ a b Jameel, Yusuf; Patrone, Carissa; Patterson, Kristen P.; West, Paul C. (2022). "Climate–poverty connections: an evidence-based review of climate solutions that generate human benefit". The Lancet Planetary Health. 6. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00280-7.
  9. ^ a b Brown, Marilyn A.; Beasley, Blair; Atalay, Fikret; et al. (2021). "Translating a Global Emission-Reduction Framework for Subnational Climate Action: A Case Study from the State of Georgia". Environmental Management. 67 (2): 205–227. doi:10.1007/s00267-020-01406-1.
  10. ^ "The Drawdown Review". Project Drawdown. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  11. ^ "Drawdown Roadmap". Project Drawdown. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  12. ^ Duchin, Faye (2017). "Climate optimism gets a road map". Science. 356 (6340): 811. doi:10.1126/science.aan2293.
  13. ^ Beslik, Sasja (2018-03-23). "Did Project Drawdown miss a crucial climate solution?". GreenBiz. Retrieved 2026-07-29.

Category:Climate change organizations based in the United States Category:Environmental organizations established in 2014 Category:501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations Category:Organizations based in San Francisco Category:2014 establishments in California

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.