Draft:Open Process Automation Forum

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti

Draft:Open Process Automation Forum
  • Comment: Much of this is sourced to their website, press releases or otherwise what they say about themselves. Other sources are trade publications which cannot be used to establish notability. S0091 (talk) 14:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Open Process Automation Forum
Founded2016; 10 years ago (2016)
ParentThe Open Group
Websitehttps://www.opengroup.org/opaf

The Open Process Automation™ Forum (OPAF) is a forum of The Open Group. The forum is responsible for development of the Open Process Automation Standard (O-PAS™ Standard) and various other supporting documents.

History

The Open Group Open Process Automation™ Forum (OPAF) held initial formation meetings in 2016 in San Francisco, California.[1]. By December 2016, there were 41 member organizations that had joined the forum during the pre-formation stage.[1] The forum was officially formed in 2017[2][3].

Membership

OPAF requires organizations to establish membership with The Open Group before participating in the forum. As of March 2024, the membership roster lists 90+ organizations. Majority of the organizations on the member list are end users, system integrators, and suppliers within the process automation industry.[4]

There are eight (8) distributed control system (DCS) vendors listed on the OPAF membership roster[4]:

  1. ABB
  2. Honeywell
  3. Rockwell Automation
  4. Schneider Electric
  5. Siemens
  6. SUPCON
  7. Valmet (Metso)
  8. Yokogawa Electric

Organization of the Forum

The forum has four main working groups (listed below) and a project manager.[5] The forum has two elected cochairs and a forum director. Each working group is led by two elected cochairs.[6]

  • Enterprise Architecture Working Group (EAWG)[7].
  • Business Working Group (BWG)[7].
  • Technology Working Group (TWG)[7].
  • Certification Working Group (CWG)[7].

Publications

Standards

The O-PAS™ Standard

Main article: Open Process Automation Standard

Guides

O PAS™ Adoption Guide

The document is 33 pages in length, available in English only, and was initially published in March 2023. The document is written in a "Question and Answer" format and provides guidance on things to consider when adopting and implementing open process automation systems in an end-user facility. The document is written from various perspectives within the process automation business ecosystem.[8]

The Open Process Automation™ Business Guide

Initially published in January 2018[9] and updated in 2021.[10] This document is 60 pages in length and available in English and Chinese translation. The document details the business case, value proposition, guiding principles, and quality attributes of the O-PAS standard. The document also defines the roles of end users, system integrators, and suppliers of hardware, software, solutions and services. The guide further outlines the value proposition for each of those actors in the business ecosystem.[11]

White Papers

The Security Approach of the O-PAS™ Standard

Published in March 2023, 16 pages in length, and available in English.[12]

Improving Profitability through Open Process Automation™ Systems

Published in November 2021 and available in English and Chinese translation.

Open Standards in Process Automation: The Key to Industrial Profitability

Published in July 2019 and available in English and Chinese translation.

Requirements for an Open Process Automation™ Standard

Published in May 2018 and available in English.

External Relationships

The Open Process Automation Forum maintains external relationships with a number of standards development organizations and trade associations[13].

Media Coverage

There are dozens of media coverage articles on OPAF listed on the organization website that span 2016 to present.[20]

An Automation.com article from January 2017 groups "suppliers that have joined the effort" as each being in one of "three camps of motivation".[1]

  • Suppliers that want to protect their business with ExxonMobil and other major users that have joined
  • Suppliers that want to gain a greater share of business from ExxonMobil and other major users that have joined
  • Suppliers that see the technological changes and open standards as an opportunity to expand their business.

An LNS Research article from 2017 outlines three possible outcomes for the O-PAS initiative: (A) limited selection, (B) stable and viable market, and (C) lowest common denominator[21]

  • Outcome A: Where a few vendors provide O-PAS products and the majority of end users buy them
  • Outcome B: Where a good percentage of vendors provide O-PAS products and many end users buy them
  • Outcome C: Where most vendors provide O-PAS products and only a few users are willing to buy them

In 2019, ExxonMobil announced a collaboration agreement with six (6) other companies: Aramco Services Company, BASF, Dow Chemical Company, Georgia-Pacific, ConocoPhillips, and Linde plc. An ExxonMobil test bed was to be operationalized later that year whereby the collaboration partners could test and evaluate the performance of individual components.[22] The test bed was initialized in 2019[2] and evolved from prototype to proof of concept and eventually to field trial as the "OPA Lighthouse Project" in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.[23]

An Automation World article from December 2019 did an overview of the Open Process Automation Forum a few years after formation. The article positions membership at around 135 organizations. The article positively covered the work done by the forum up to that point. It also balances the positive coverage by reporting that "not everyone agrees that this open architecture approach is a good thing." It further details Honeywell and Emerson as two DCS suppliers electing to withhold OPAF participation.[24]

An Automation World article from February 2025 draws parallels between the Open Process Automation Forum's O-PAS standard and the concept of software defined manufacturing. The article also contrasts traditional proprietary technology stacks and open technology stacks where hardware and software are independent and not tied tied together through a proprietary relationship.[25]

References

  1. ^ a b c "The Open Group Launches Initial Meeting of Open Process Automation Forum". automation.com. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
  2. ^ a b Neil, Stephanie (2017-01-04). "Introducing the Open Process Automation Forum. Finally". Automation World. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
  3. ^ "The Open Group Launches the Open Process Automation™ Forum | www.opengroup.org". www.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
  4. ^ a b Report, Report (March 19, 2024). "Membership Report on March 19, 2024". OPAF Membership Report. Archived from the original on March 19, 2024. Retrieved March 19, 2024.
  5. ^ "OPAF Org Chart | www.opengroup.org". www.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  6. ^ "The Open Process Automation™ Forum Team | www.opengroup.org". www.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-06-11.
  7. ^ a b c d Kalyanaraman, Mohan; Bartusiak, Don; Bitar, Steve; Houk, Bradley; DeBari, David; Brandon, Williams (June 1, 2020). "Process Automation Opens Up". Chemical Processing. Archived from the original on March 2, 2024. Retrieved Aug 12, 2024.
  8. ^ "O PAS™ Adoption Guide". publications.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-05-13.
  9. ^ The Open Process Automation Business Guide (PDF). The Open Group. January 2018. Retrieved May 13, 2024.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  10. ^ "The Open Process Automation™ Business Guide". publications.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-05-13.
  11. ^ Jenkins, Scott (2024-04-22). "Open Process Automation Value Opportunities for the Chemical Industry". Chemical Engineering. Retrieved 2024-05-01.
  12. ^ "The Security Approach of the O-PAS™ Standard". publications.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  13. ^ "Atila Belloquim on LinkedIn: #theopengroup". pt.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2024-03-09.
  14. ^ a b "Open Process Automation is Gaining Sustainable Momentum". www.yokogawa.com. Retrieved 2024-05-13.
  15. ^ "FieldComm Group and The Open Group Process Automation Forum announce liaison agreement". automation.com. Retrieved 2024-03-09.
  16. ^ TimesTech (2024-04-25). "PICMG InterEdge and OPAF Partnership to Advance Open Process Control Technology". TimesTech. Retrieved 2024-05-01.
  17. ^ wendelien (2018-11-27). "PLCopen cooperates with OPAF". plcopen.org. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  18. ^ "The Open Group and Universal Automation". 2024-06-07. Archived from the original on 2024-06-07. Retrieved 2024-06-07.
  19. ^ NAMUR (2 August 2018). "The Open Group and NAMUR sign memorandum of understanding to cooperate on open automation system standards". www.namur.net. Retrieved 2024-03-09.
  20. ^ "The Open Group Open Process Automation™ Forum Media Coverage | www.opengroup.org". www.opengroup.org. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  21. ^ "Gauging if the Open Process Automation Forum Will Deliver". blog.lnsresearch.com. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  22. ^ "ExxonMobil Signs Collaboration Agreement to Accelerate Development of Open Process Automation Systems". www.businesswire.com. 2019-07-18. Retrieved 2024-04-22.
  23. ^ Montague, Jim (2024-03-21). "ExxonMobil still leads on OPA testbeds". Control Global. Retrieved 2024-08-07.
  24. ^ Neil, Stephanie (2019-12-06). "Where Are They Now? An Open Process Automation Forum Update". Automation World. Retrieved 2024-03-19.
  25. ^ Bitar, Steve; Burns, Matthew (2025-02-20). "Software-Defined Manufacturing's Potential to Deliver to Automation Interoperability". Automation World. Retrieved 2025-03-08.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.