You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti…
Submission declined on 4 January 2026 by Somepinkdude (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Mgp28 9 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 28 August 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Pythoncoder 11 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
Submission declined on 29 July 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by Pythoncoder 12 months ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
| Type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Marketing technology |
| Founded | 2014 |
| Founder | Willem van der Weide, André Merkus |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
Key people | Melle Staelenberg (CEO) |
| Products | Marketing mix modeling software |
| Services | Software as a service |
| Website | www |
Objective Platform is a software company based in Amsterdam, Netherlands,[1] that develops marketing mix modeling (MMM) technology. It provides software-as-a-service tools designed to measure the impact of media investments.[2][3][4]
Objective Platform was founded in 2014 as Objective Partners by Willem van der Weide and André Merkus.[5][1] The company began as a consultancy before shifting to a software model. In 2020, it raised €2 million in funding from Dutch venture capital firm Newion and other investors.[6][7][8] In 2024, Melle Staelenberg was appointed chief executive officer.[9][10]
The company develops MMM software that evaluates how marketing investments perform across different channels.[11] Reported applications include sponsorship measurement projects for media companies.[12]
In 2021, Objective Platform was listed in Forrester Research’s Now Tech: Marketing Measurement & Optimization Solutions report.[13] In 2023, Marketing Tribune reported that the company joined a national benchmark project led by Mark Stronger.[14][15] In 2025, it received a MarTech Breakthrough Award for “Best Marketing Attribution Solution.”[16]
In 2025, Objective Platform announced a partnership with creative data platform Vidmob[17] to integrate creative performance data with its MMM software.[18][19]
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.