Draft:Mandibil

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti

Draft:Mandibil


Mandibil is an independent philosopher. Mandibil is a pseudonym, based on the two Danish words "Mand" (Meaning "man"), "i" (meaning "in") and "bil" (meaning "car") together Mandibil (similar to Man-in-(a)-car). He has always been a thinker and a bit of an outsider. He only started philosophizing seriously from around 2010-2011, after listening to a podcast by Stefan Molyneux, a guest host on the Peter Schiff show.

From September 2015, he started talking about his philosophy on his Youtube channel called simply "Mandibil", as he often sat in his car talking, and have, as of February 2026, produced over a 1000 philosophically oriented videos.

In late 2025 he began presenting "My philosophy", a series of seven hour-long presentations of his complete philosophy, which means everything from a reduction base (starting point) to a perfect moral principle. This was the condensation of all the thinking he had done up until that point, and being convinced that there were no major aspects left to scrutinize. This iis a complete philosophy, never attempted before, in all of human history, in so far as all the necessary steps needed to get from a reduction base to a moral principle is covered, is completely coherent and without any holes.

Mandibil has critizised several other online philosophers, most notably "analytic idealist" Bernardo Kastrup and his early inspiration Stefan Molyneux. Particularly Molyneux's attempt at "proving" a moral "framework, which he calls Universally Preferable Behaviour or UPB. Mandibil takes a unique approach to ethics, which pays homage to David Hume's legendary critique of how philosopher's usually try to argue for their morality, also known as "the is-ought gap" (based on a quote from David Hume's "A Treatise of Human Nature"). Mandibil argues, that the underlying problem, Hume was really touching on, is, that no matter how much thinking - of any kind - you may have done, none of it justifies you bossing anyone else around. It just does not follow. It is bad logic, a fairly obvious fallacy, as Hume himself pointed at and suggested might subvert all the vulgar morality of the ages. People just take it for granted that since there is a "field" called ethics and an idea of morality and moral principles, that there must be "something" justifying moralising. There isn't, but everyone pretends there is, without justifying it. David Hume's insight was so monumental, because it sits exactly on the last step to finalizing your "complete" philosophy. If you cannot "bridge" Hume's gap, you have no business bossing anyone around. Mandibil takes a different approach, that puts yourself at the center of things.

References

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.