You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by CNMall41 10 months ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
Submission declined on 2 March 2025 by Jeromeenriquez (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Jeromeenriquez 17 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 6 November 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by SafariScribe 21 months ago.
|
'''Luke Gamble''' is a British veterinary surgeon, charity founder and television presenter. He is the founder of the international animal welfare charity Worldwide Veterinary Service[1] and its associated rabies programme Mission Rabies[2].
In 2003, Gamble founded Worldwide Veterinary Service (WVS)[3], an organisation that provides veterinary support, training and medical supplies to animal welfare groups internationally to improve animal welfare. In 2013, the charity launched Mission Rabies, a programme focused on mass canine rabies vaccination campaigns in countries where the disease remains endemic.
He has appeared on television programmes about veterinary work, including the Sky series ''Vet Adventures''[4] and the National Geographic documentary ''T. Rex Autopsy''.[5]
Gamble is the author of ''The Vet'', a memoir about his experiences in veterinary practice and animal welfare work[6]. Gamble has written fiction for children and young readers and is identified by his publisher as the author of The Secret Animal Society series.[7]
Gamble was included in The Independent on Sunday feature "Great Britons 2012", where he is described as a "TV vet and charity worker".[8]
NatGeo2013 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.