Draft:Influence theory

Submission declined on 4 August 2026 by Balabush (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Balabush 6 days ago. Last edited by Gurkubondinn 6 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 24 February 2026 by Grapesurgeon (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Grapesurgeon 5 months ago.

• Comment: I suggest merging this draft into an existing article rather than keeping it as a standalone page. The content covers several established topics, mainly Social influence and Persuasion, but the sources don't clearly establish "influence theory" as a distinct field. Balabush (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by Gurkubondinn (talk | contribs) 6 days ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review

This article may incorporate text from a large language model, which is prohibited in Wikipedia articles. It may include hallucinated information, copyright violations, claims not verified in cited sources, original research, or fictitious references. Any such material should be removed. (January 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Influence theory is a branch of social psychology that examines the processes by which individuals or groups affect the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of others.

The study of influence has roots in social psychology, with early experiments focusing on conformity, obedience, and authority. Solomon Asch's conformity experiments demonstrated that individuals often align their judgments with a group consensus, even when it contradicts their own perceptions.^[1] Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments revealed the extent to which people would comply with authority even when their actions caused harm to others.^[2] These early studies laid the foundation for later developments in influence theory, particularly Robert Cialdini's identification of six principles of influence: reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, and scarcity, which have become central to understanding persuasion.^[3]

In the field of politics, Bennett (2012) shows that social media influences the willingness to politically participate.^[4] Social media is not merely a channel for political information but a place where political identity is constructed, contested, and reinforced.^[5]

The rise of social media has amplified social influence, with algorithms shaping content that reinforces existing beliefs,^[6] and creating echo chambers.^[7] In the field of marketing, digital influencers use reciprocity to influence their followers. A 2019 study demonstrates that the informative value of influencer-generated content, trustworthiness, and attractiveness positively influence followers' trust in branded posts, enhancing brand awareness and purchase intentions.^[6][8] A 2023 study shows that viral marketing increases purchasing behavior on Instagram's adds platform.^[9]

Studies on large language models (LLMs) explored how AI-driven systems can produce persuasive messages based on individual preferences. AI systems can employ influence techniques to subtly persuade users in political campaigns, marketing, and even personal decision-making.^[10]

Bai et al. demonstrate that messages generated by LLMs (OpenAI's GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 models) can effectively persuade individuals on various policy issues, including highly polarized topics such as assault weapon bans, carbon taxes, and paid parental leave programs. The research indicates that LLM-generated messages were as persuasive as those created by humans, highlighting the potential for AI to influence political attitudes.^[11] Burtell and Woodside examine how AI systems can alter human relationships and views. The authors warn that highly persuasive AI systems could alter our information.^[12]

A study published in Nature Human Behavior found that AI can be more persuasive than humans in online debates. The research shows that when AI has access to minimal demographic information about its debate partner, it can tailor its arguments to be more persuasive, raising concerns about the potential for AI to manipulate public opinion through personalized narratives.^[13]

Sabour et al. investigate how AI systems exploit users' cognitive biases and emotional vulnerabilities to steer them toward specific outcomes. The research found that participants interacting with manipulative AI agents were more likely to make harmful decisions compared to those interacting with neutral agents.^[14]

Persuasion techniques can vary across cultures. In collectivistic cultures, emotions are more effective, whereas in individualistic cultures, facts and logic tend to yield better results. Understanding cultural differences is essential when applying influence strategies in diverse global contexts.^[15]

Persuasion is a primary cognitive mechanism, where individuals change their attitudes or beliefs through communication. The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)^[16] distinguishes between two main routes of persuasion: central route and peripheral route.

Persuasion through the central route occurs when individuals actively engage with the content of a message, leading to deeper, more enduring attitude changes. This route is effective when the audience is able to carefully evaluate the arguments presented.^[16]

The peripheral route involves superficial cues (e.g., attractiveness or credibility of the speaker) that lead to temporary changes in attitude. This route is often used when individuals lack motivation or ability to process the information.^[16]

One of the key mechanisms of persuasion is social proof, where individuals look to others to guide their behavior, especially in uncertain or ambiguous situations. This is often employed in marketing and advertising, where consumer reviews are used to influence purchasing decisions.^[15]

Social influence works by exploiting conformity, compliance and obedience.

Conformity is the process by which individuals change their behavior to align with group norms or the expectations of others. This mechanism is particularly strong when individuals are motivated by the desire to be accepted by the group or to avoid social rejection.^[17][18]

Compliance occurs when individuals change their behavior in response to a direct request. Techniques such as foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face take advantage of commitment and consistency mechanisms, making individuals more likely to comply with larger requests after initial smaller ones.^[19][3]

Obedience is a form of social influence where individuals follow instructions or orders from authority figures, often without questioning them.^[2][20] While obedience is necessary in certain contexts, such as following instructions in a job or obeying laws, it can also lead to people follow orders without questioning them.^[20]

Power is a central concept in influence theory, and individuals often exert influence based on their position in a social hierarchy. French and Raven identified five types of power: legitimate power, expert power, referent power, coercive power, and reward power.^[21]

Legitimate power is derived from a formal position of authority, such as a manager or a government official. People comply with requests from those in authority because they recognize their right to make demands.^[21]

Expert power stems from the perceived expertise or specialized knowledge of an individual. This form of power is common in technical fields where individuals defer to experts on specific matters.^[21]

Referent power is based on admiration or identification with a person. Individuals tend to comply with requests from people they admire or wish to emulate.^[21]

Coercive power is the ability to impose negative consequences for non-compliance, such as punishment or social exclusion. This form of power is often used in authoritarian systems or in abusive relationships.^[21]

Reward power is the ability to offer rewards for compliance, such as bonuses, promotions, or social recognition. Reward power is commonly used in both organizational settings and personal relationship.^[21]

Emotional mechanisms include fear and guilt.

Fear is often used in public health campaigns to motivate individuals to engage in behaviors that reduce risks (e.g., anti-smoking and vaccination campaigns). However, excessive fear can lead to avoidance rather than compliance, so it must be used carefully.^[22]

Guilt is frequently used in charitable donations and pro-social campaigns. When individuals feel guilty for not taking action, they are often motivated to comply with requests, such as donating money to a cause or volunteering.^[23]

Behavioral mechanisms include positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, and punishment.

Positive reinforcement occurs when desired behaviors are rewarded, thus increasing the likelihood of the behavior being repeated.^[24]

Negative reinforcement involves removing an unpleasant stimulus when a desired behavior occurs. This also increases the likelihood of the behavior being repeated.^[24]

Punishment is used to decrease the occurrence of undesirable behaviors by applying negative consequences, such as fines, reprimands, or social exclusion.^[24]

Cognitive dissonance is a critical psychological mechanism that motivates individuals to reduce the discomfort caused by inconsistent beliefs or behaviors.^[25] When people experience cognitive dissonance, they are driven to align their attitudes with their actions to relieve the tension.^[25] For example, individuals who smoke despite knowing the health risks may either change their behavior (quit smoking) or change their belief (downplay the risks) to reduce the dissonance.^[25]