Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page.
Submission declined on 3 January 2026 by EatingCarBatteries (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Zzz plant 12 months ago.
|
| This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Title of your draft. |
| Type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Facilitation, Consulting, Training |
| Founded | 1998 |
| Founder | Bruce E. Honig |
| Headquarters | San Francisco Bay Area, California, United States |
Area served | Worldwide |
Key people | Bruce E. Honig (Founder) |
| Website | ideaguides |
IdeaGuides is a facilitation and consulting firm based in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. Founded in 1998 by creativity specialist and facilitator Bruce E. Honig, the company provides services in meeting facilitation, creative thinking, team building, and organizational development.[1]
IdeaGuides was established in 1998 by Bruce E. Honig, who has worked in the field of creativity, facilitation, and organizational development for over 35 years. The firm originated to address the need for more engaging, results-oriented meetings and retreats.[2]
Their services are tailored for both nonprofit and for-profit sectors, including education, healthcare, and government agencies.[3]
Bruce E. Honig is an author, facilitator, game designer, and trainer. He holds a B.A. in Educational Philosophy and an M.A. in Educational Psychology and Curriculum Design. He has authored several books, including Creative Collaboration: Simple Tools for Inspired Teamwork, and has developed creativity-focused games such as CREATE: The Game That Challenges and Expands Your Creativity.[4]
IdeaGuides has served a broad array of clients including:
The company is listed in directories such as Innov8rs and SHRM’s vendor directory, where it is recognized for its work in facilitation and organizational development.[5][6]
Bruce Honig has authored multiple books and articles on team creativity and facilitation and has designed creativity-based board and card games. Several of these tools are used in workshops to promote engagement and collaborative problem-solving.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.