Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citat
| This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by ChomponU Pongsawet (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? |
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Amidst the geopolitical escalation, the concept of the "Hormuzification of maritime straits" has emerged as an analytical tool for understanding exceptional state behaviour. Within the logic of this framework, a strategic chokepoint, at a moment of heightened tension, assumes three interlinked operational dimensions: an instrument of pressure, an instrument of disruption, and an instrument of attrition.
This concept does not denote a permanent maritime policy, but rather the temporary conversion of a vital sea passage into an exceptional instrument of leverage, resorted to by a state confronting war or direct military threat. In accordance with the Committee's definition, the concept applies only when four constitutive pillars are present: (1) a context of armed conflict; (2) control over a geographically sensitive chokepoint; (3) a temporary, non-permanent character; and (4) non-applicability to stable states situated outside immediate zones of tension.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.