Draft:ClimateAi

Submission declined on 7 April 2026 by Flexagoon (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Flexagoon 4 months ago. Last edited by Flexagoon 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 10 March 2026 by RangersRus (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Declined by RangersRus 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 March 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Pythoncoder 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 March 2026 by SocDoneLeft (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. Declined by SocDoneLeft 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 9 March 2026 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Declined by Theroadislong 5 months ago.

• Comment: All of the sources are interviews, which are not considered independent sources. 🍅 fx (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I wonder how many gallons of water were wasted generating this draft —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:24, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: 1. Please read WP:REFB and format your references accordingly. Use {{cite web}}, {{cite news}}, {{cite book}} as appropriate. 2. Please add categories to the bottom of the page. 3. Please incorporate all "further reading" sources (which are just raw URLs) into inline references. SocDoneLeft (talk) 05:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

ClimateAi is an American climate intelligence company.^[1] It provides real-time climate risk data to companies in the agricultural value chain.^[2]

ClimateAi was founded in 2017 by Himanshu Gupta and Max Evans while they were students at Stanford University. The company was established to apply physics-driven artificial intelligence models to help farmers understand how short and long-term climate changes impact their crops.^[3]

It has revived recognition from Time Magazine (2022) and Fast Company (2025) for its model applications in agriculture.^{[4] [5]} In 2023, climateAi raised $22M in a series B funding round.^[6]

ClimateAi provides climate forecasting models designed to predict how short-term weather and long-term climate trends will impact crop yields and food supply chains.

Its models have been cited in reports on climate-related risks to crops and commodity markets, including cocoa price increases, rice shortages, and shifting wine-growing regions.^{[7][8][9][10]} As well as in a range of other media coverage of global food supply risks and climate impacts on agriculture.^[11][12]

• Climate risk
• Climate change adaptation
• Artificial intelligence

Category:Climate change organizations Category:Artificial intelligence companies Category:Companies based in San Francisco Category:Technology companies established in 2017