You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed arti
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Type of site | Satirical news, civic technology, legislative commentary |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| URL | absurdityindex |
| Commercial | No |
| Registration | None required |
| Launched | 2025 |
| Current status | Active |
Content license | MIT License (source code) |
| Written in | JavaScript, Astro, MDX |
The Absurdity Index is an American political satire and civic technology website that scores real federal legislation on a 1–10 "Absurdity Index" scale and publishes satirical bills—fictional legislation written to highlight common-sense policy gaps.[1] The site pairs analysis of actual congressional bills with tongue-in-cheek legislative proposals described as "so reasonable that no actual Congress would ever pass" them.[1]
The site maintains an editorial policy requiring that every factual claim include a verifiable proof link to authoritative sources such as Congress.gov, the Cornell Law Institute, or official House and Senate records.[2] Absurdity scores are presented as subjective editorial opinion rather than objective measurement.[2]
The Absurdity Index describes itself as non-partisan, stating that it critiques legislation "from all political persuasions" and aims to "be funny without being unfair."[1]
The Absurdity Index launched in 2025 as an open-source project combining legislative analysis with political satire.[1] The site is released under the MIT License and is built using the Astro web framework with Tailwind CSS, hosted on Cloudflare Pages.[3] The project uses the X API for trend monitoring and engagement with congressional topics.[4]
The site's primary content consists of analysis and scoring of actual federal legislation introduced in the United States Congress. As of February 2026[update], the site has scored 33 real bills spanning multiple sessions of Congress, including legislation from the 117th, 118th, and 119th Congresses.[5]
Each real bill entry includes the official bill number, sponsor information (including party affiliation and state), committee assignment, legislative status, a plain-language summary, and a direct link to the bill's page on Congress.gov.[5] Bills are categorized by topic including Budget, Technology, Defense, Ethics, Healthcare, and others.
Notable scored bills include the FairTax Act (H.R. 25, scored 8/10), the TikTok ban legislation (Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, scored 7/10), and the pizza-as-vegetable provision in the Consolidated Appropriations Act (scored 10/10, the site's highest rating).[5]
In addition to real legislation, the site publishes fictional bills in two subcategories:[6]
As of February 2026[update], the site has published 23 sensible bills and 4 absurd bills, for a total of 60 pieces of legislation analyzed or created.[6]
The Absurdity Index uses a 1–10 scoring system divided into four tiers:[2]
| Score | Tier name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | "Suspiciously Reasonable" | Legislation that functions as intended; routine measures such as post office namings or technical corrections |
| 4–6 | "Pork-Adjacent" | Bills with creative backronyms, suspiciously specific regulations, or signs of pork barrel spending |
| 7–8 | "Hold My Gavel" | Legislation featuring significant earmarks, studies on self-evident topics, or provisions added during late-night sessions |
| 9–10 | "Fish on Meth" | The highest absurdity tier, named after a federally funded study on the effects of methamphetamine on zebrafish; reserved for legislation the site considers to have reached bipartisan consensus—in bewilderment |
The scoring considers five factors: wasteful or inefficient spending, tortured acronyms and naming conventions, time spent relative to importance, actual impact versus stated goals, and unintended consequences.[2]
The site offers several interactive features beyond bill analysis:[7]
The site is a statically generated website built with Astro 5, styled with Tailwind CSS v4, and deployed on Cloudflare Pages with Workers providing server-side API functionality.[3] Content is authored in MDX (a combination of Markdown and JSX) and validated against a Zod schema at build time.[3]
The site's design employs a government-parody aesthetic with a color palette of navy, gold, cream, and parchment tones, and uses serif typography (Libre Caslon Text) to evoke official government documents.[1]
The continuous integration pipeline runs on self-hosted Kubernetes using Argo Workflows, polling the Git repository every 60 seconds for changes and auto-deploying to Cloudflare Pages.[3]
The Absurdity Index maintains several editorial standards:[1][2]
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.